Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-yang-14.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 29 August 2018 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C56130E65 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oVEGN6Tknfpr for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3463130E58 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4492; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1535548046; x=1536757646; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=LhsJ97IWNMHM6sFhZuhtqOHYKX23ep+1FHwn65dtlCM=; b=S55thh9VwWlQaAHaZql/fy9NEbrfbwLd6mtZbV+ssvEzpQ1pQCzbTQ3z EKRY7KAEYtSD9khWM/XrQxYupqjG5/fOGWHrrtA3x9bp/GPgBd51Teyhu UOOs2j5ywAs71Z0WLtOKqNe8okBpP54buj8vC1JX926kT0RlDEB7pkpiM I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DYAgCjmYZb/4cNJK1aGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNPZX8oCoNoiBGOFCV4gkWSa4F6CyOESQIXgnIhNBgBAgEBAgEBAm0cDIU3AQEBAwEjEVEEAgEIEgMBAgICJgICAjAVAg4CBAESgyEBgXkID6NmgS6Ea4V2gQuJBReCAIESJwwTghc1gxsBAQIBARaESDGCJgKbOQkChjGJQBeBP0iDbIheiyOIDgIRFIEkHThAgRJwFRohKgGCPgmLDIU+bwGLVIEcAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,303,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="163677376"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2018 13:07:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w7TD7PVR007866 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:07:25 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:07:25 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:07:25 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-yang-14.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUPvIB34JOm0RW30mVL1ewTZS57aTWtI+A
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:07:25 +0000
Message-ID: <850C10F3-8BDB-4510-A402-C96E77811C48@cisco.com>
References: <153547591127.23644.759249509265597540@ietfa.amsl.com> <9CFF3338-763D-46EE-9436-4B438F1A8BA7@cisco.com> <073a01d43f90$03548be0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <073a01d43f90$03548be0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.45.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F3EF9A482DB8BA4782263F36FE4477EB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.151, xch-rtp-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/p4AJzlp-fKa55_b5SwhLa-XHIhU>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-yang-14.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:07:28 -0000

Hi Tom, 
I believe I've fixed these in the -15 version. I see I have down references in the IDNITs which I will address in a future version. 
Thanks again for your review,
Acee 

On 8/29/18, 8:01 AM, "tom petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:

    Acee
    
    Thank you for the list of features in s.2.4; much appreciated.  A couple
    of minor editorial tweaks perhaps to
    
    11. admin-control> Support Administrative control of the protocol
    26. bfd: Support BFD detection of OSPF neighbor reachability
            [RFC5880], xref target="RFC5881"/>
    
    With the BFD reference, yes, I like
           reference "RFC YYYY - YANG Data Model for Bidirectional
    but would still add a Note to the RFC Editor asking them to replace YYYY
    with the assigned RFC number for
       [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang]
    (which is how it appears in the Normative References).
    
    And you still have a
    link-state database
    in
    rpc clear-database
    which I prefer to be
    Link State Database
    
    Tom Petch
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
    To: <lsr@ietf.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 6:34 PM
    
    > This version addresses Tom Petch's last call comments.
    > Thanks,
    > Acee
    >
    > On 8/28/18, 1:10 PM, "Lsr on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org"
    <lsr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
    >
    >
    >     A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
    directories.
    >     This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the
    IETF.
    >
    >             Title           : Yang Data Model for OSPF Protocol
    >             Authors         : Derek Yeung
    >                               Yingzhen Qu
    >                               Jeffrey Zhang
    >                               Ing-Wher Chen
    >                               Acee Lindem
    >     Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-yang-14.txt
    >     Pages           : 115
    >     Date            : 2018-08-28
    >
    >     Abstract:
    >        This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to
    configure
    >        and manage OSPF.  The model is based on YANG 1.1 as defined in
    RFC
    >        7950 and conforms to the Network Management Datastore
    Architecture
    >        (NDMA) as described in RFC 8342.
    >
    >
    >     The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    >
    >     There are also htmlized versions available at:
    >     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-yang-14
    >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-yang-14
    >
    >     A diff from the previous version is available at:
    >     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-yang-14
    >
    >
    >     Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
    submission
    >     until the htmlized version and diff are available at
    tools.ietf.org.
    >
    >     Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    >     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    >