Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

["Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Amanda.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lsr <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Amanda Baber via RT
Sent: 09 July 2020 01:37
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; acee=[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Peter, Ketan, Acee, 

We've added a permanent entry for B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry and moved the Flooding Request bit registration to 0x00000020:

0x00000010	B-bit	[draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01]
0x00000020	Flooding Request bit	[draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding]

Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Wed Jul 08 08:53:07 2020, [e-mail] wrote:
> Amanda,
> 
> On 07/07/2020 22:54, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> > Peter, should we go ahead?
> 
> yes, please.
> 
> thanks,
> Peter
> 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Amanda
> > 
> > On Tue Jul 07 20:14:48 2020, [e-mail] wrote:
> >> Gunter is on vacation...
> >> Thanks,
> >> Acee
> >>
> >> On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" 
> >> <[e-mail]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ketan, Peter,
> >>
> >> I believe we're waiting for Gunter to approve as the remaining 
> >> expert, but we can move ahead if Peter confirms that we don't need to wait.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Amanda
> >>
> >> On Mon Jul 06 03:46:02 2020, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>> Hi Amanda/All,
> >>>
> >>> I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x00000010 for 
> >>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x00000020 for draft-ietf-
> >>> lsr-
> >>> dynamic-flooding?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ketan
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>   From: Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]>
> >>> Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
> >>> To: Acee Lindem (acee) <[e-mail]>
> >>> Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <[e-mail]>; 
> >>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) 
> >>> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; 
> >>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> >>> acee=[e-mail]
> >>> Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for 
> >>> draft- ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
> >>>
> >>> Hi Peter, all,
> >>>
> >>>>> For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration 
> >>>>> is described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this 
> >>>>> may have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation 
> >>>>> procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication 
> >>>>> for permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree, 
> >>>>> permanent registrations can be made in Expert Review registries 
> >>>>> at any time.
> >>>>> Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" 
> >>>>> designation from that registration?
> >>>>
> >>>> please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.
> >>>
> >>> The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the 
> >>> draft-ietf-lsr- dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 
> >>> Extended Options and Flags, currently still assigned 0x00000010:
> >>>
> >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> Amanda
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr