Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

Paul Wells <pauwells@cisco.com> Wed, 14 August 2019 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <pauwells@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A24B120F2A for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R63SD17To0nF for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C73C120F14 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5371; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565817549; x=1567027149; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1L2hA8RE5OUYuCtJxNrx6qkwGQ6MLcfecr8A9h7OWfw=; b=ZEBfYanWMV3s5F6FFQH+f05z+G+F5yanVWnYao805QK16NhQkLvP8hqu c8QWzycoaDuFvT1WYVjN02Gv+S7YywAyy4McHI5KJWyuasaMGigzKmFLY xxPMZGepTZvIogeD6ZKIa2k6pto4xQkJtgaW4YgnTIpmrlyOONu99LPts 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,386,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="613852653"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 Aug 2019 21:19:07 +0000
Received: from pauwells-mint19.cisco.com (sjc-pauwells-nitro7.cisco.com [10.19.43.168]) (authenticated bits=0) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x7ELJ5N3008039 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:19:06 GMT
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
References: <94BA6E02-A8B7-4EA8-8D08-55A2B3E447A0@cisco.com>
From: Paul Wells <pauwells@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ebab2f75-07ac-e9f8-e57f-1f5de1ffa15a@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:19:05 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <94BA6E02-A8B7-4EA8-8D08-55A2B3E447A0@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8D2487D3772EA0DDC0C3AE2E"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Authenticated-User: pauwells
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.19.43.168, sjc-pauwells-nitro7.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/pYVh_ntiXIvoKDnHlzz_xB6dWCY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:19:11 -0000

Hi Acee,

I am not aware of any relevant IPR.

Paul

On 8/12/19 9:36 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> Authors,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR associated with the subject draft.
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
>
> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
>
> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing
>
> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a
>
> response has been received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
>
> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>