Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

I Support  WG adoption of draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01.  This
new ISIS flood reflection extension similar to BGP route reflection
scalability concept, provides a valuable feature to optimize many L1/L2
adjacencies for very large contiguous L2 domains that span L1 areas.

Gyan

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 8:12 PM Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=
40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Support the author’s request for adoption.
>
>
>
> Jeffrey
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Tony Przygienda
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:04 PM
> *To:* lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
>
>
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
> I would like to officially call out for adoption of
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rw1hQXbYkcBVgIhCsV-fUUskQePI13qfrKaHzTKKtytMjDTJa3_BPIrtqp9tewb8$>
> as WG document
>
>
>
> At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works
> meeting use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor
> draft-proxy is addressing or can satisfy in terms of deployment realities.
> While we would love to not squat on codepoints and ideally have an
> interoperable solution between vendors it will be the customer reality that
> will drive deployment and ultimately what runs in their networks.
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> --- tony
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD