Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Thu, 13 May 2021 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2D33A0997; Thu, 13 May 2021 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=GrEmbcix; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=pcrKU9vy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31hjkUcGNRr4; Thu, 13 May 2021 12:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82373A0995; Thu, 13 May 2021 12:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13520; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1620933161; x=1622142761; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=O/IDnF/+eKcu+hXF9H8o5G7yz33ovAjmvFUEaNKx/KQ=; b=GrEmbcixd0Uzq/23hnxA0lXczuUUMnnJ92Oz8JYp64X3jiuPa6XfzmNP zMKk+S1ZapkT8zR14Zx9Jr3aBQqYv+XuZRU5SUfzDnXeHHnkVhQz5WI4u YdxGSevB8EdKDLhdZEbss53guZNNZz/hZWNOAFtlVpIhsAlkuPcp7pXMm s=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0ADAAB7eJ1gmIENJK1aGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBARIBAQEBAgIBAQEBggMFAQEBAQsBgSIwUX5aNjGER4NIA4RZYIh/A4o6iiiEfoEuFIERA1QLAQEBDQEBKgEUAgQBAYRPAheBXQIlNAkOAgQBAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQUBAQECAQYEFAEBAQEBAQEBaIVQDYZEAQEBBAEiChMBATcBDwIBCBEEAQEoAwICAh8RFAkIAgQBDQUIgmkBgX5XAy8BnEwCih96gTKBAYIGAQEGBASFPQ0LghMJgToBgnqEDAEBgROFRyccgUlEgRVDgl8+gVJNggocFR+CYTaCLYFpW2oBA4FSMYEMOJNrQogFM51zWwqDFpEphlQEhVoRg1mRMZAslTSCFo0SkAWEUgICAgIEBQIOAQEGgVQ4gVtwFTuCaVAXAg6OHwwNCRWDOYpdczgCBgEJAQEDCXyMFAEB
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:yFQoZBHrEnzb5m7/zmSH+Z1GfsYY04WdBeZdwpYigqhFNKWu45qkO 1bQtr1hj17MCIPc7f8My+/bqLvpVmFI55Gd+GsDf5pBW15g640WkgUsDdTDBRj9K/jnPCA/F d5JEl5o43/9NlJaS47yYlTIqSi06jgfUhz0KQtyILHzHYjfx8S63uy/4dvdeQJN0TG8erh1a h6xqFa5iw==
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:l7XuQ6GIl+dyXufMpLqFN5HXdLJyesId70hD6qkvc31om52j+f xGws516fatskdvZJkh8erwX5VoMkmsi6KdgLNhc4tKOTOHhILGFvAY0WKP+UyEJ8S6zJ8g6U 4CSdk+NDSTNykBsS+S2mDReLxMrKjlgcKVbKXlvgpQpGpRGsddBnJCe36m+zpNNXB77PQCZf 6hz/sCgwDlVWUcb8y9CHVAdfPEvcf3mJXvZgNDLwI76SGV5AnYqILSIly95FMzQjlPybAt/S zuiAri/JiutPm911v1y3LT1ZJLg9Hso+EzR/Bky/JlaAkEuDzYILiJaIfy+wzdZ9vfrmrCpe O85ivI+f4Dsk85MFvF+ScFkDOQoQrGo0WSuWNwx0GT+vAQgFkBepd8bUUzSGqC16NohqAO7I tbm22erJZZFhXGgWD04MXJTQhjkg6urWMlivN7tQ0TbWIyUs4bkWUkxjIeLH7AJlON1GktKp gjMCgd3ocfTbq+VQGXgoBC+q3ZYp0DJGbOfqFZgL3h79F/pgEP86I3/r1soks9
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,296,1613433600"; d="scan'208,217";a="714519690"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 May 2021 19:12:40 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 14DJCcg6019869 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 13 May 2021 19:12:40 GMT
Received: from xfe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.37.135.124) by xbe-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Thu, 13 May 2021 14:12:38 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xfe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.37.135.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Thu, 13 May 2021 14:12:38 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:12:37 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dsmcRaTtLsqHj9eHyf7ilAxkBOR2nUIyiLhyC3jY/HKLxfvqTsQMHe6LhMqRz0cUANVY/yaBq/JEoeP9b+JvVYDKVs7/CQdwiZNgkU/tkqzd6R+XhNYZu/M+nzuT4I+Z4TR4lqU9tmsZ14CzDjJA6cekEiWoqPPuSZL2cPP8VCpPRg2j3nSZglGVhPuLeEYZvIsfPDhBi+mMkHr0Aw91cViHOJChF73yQK3V3anY5Dwqe541qJ/myJS6yJf1meiLCLsEfp/I7EjUsnKepAtbcvi0ruOinqPyEB4ql5bE+6kVUki1cRrAhprDm6TWRAsNs3qncSQ6mlppYUFyt1Du0g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=O/IDnF/+eKcu+hXF9H8o5G7yz33ovAjmvFUEaNKx/KQ=; b=Hk5Z79ey1ntlmnHbwLDDTbVY3VvxvISWwAH2JDa/Gt11+DEKIqPRU1g7tGPzHk+xe9BmBWxub3/Wrg+iONUUi+mk5dHP23TH9EXb+zx3WcHh3kRXnStK0UrrDegZ0BdLpyu6e7/nWnZm28Fjt6e011StpmKmOO5pLrLt/a04sWqZXyifxfTrJml9VGtZNZRC1/D+5Rv/3bywjGSmgEvLfbmGwSkA0chLfJ8YaDS2/E+Gv0xiqv9XYJrd+zqMFWawanEGzO58wt1kefE8r6AqtIeuqHs/YpMPaUW/FOcNntPxv9pnzEfz0jXMMkjDSUA8gSa+w8kAUZ9a8SgOhWlEow==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=O/IDnF/+eKcu+hXF9H8o5G7yz33ovAjmvFUEaNKx/KQ=; b=pcrKU9vy0Pb8JSHvX7o18sojXEIcsuT3olljOnDxnVsJ+v9nfpVvDo+5rjD64SmijoAhAk7LlCEQkSseosrvL3DiBKdaKV16nBAjdfKprpY2AgG0D8X55s0OFbWcoIl5dqfzPKMuIu2qD4E4Y4Ds7qdWD67WVpDRIQBL9CZcsbk=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c1::14) by BYAPR11MB3367.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:79::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4129.28; Thu, 13 May 2021 19:12:36 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5df9:c2f0:149e:56d2]) by BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5df9:c2f0:149e:56d2%4]) with mapi id 15.20.4129.025; Thu, 13 May 2021 19:12:36 +0000
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHXSCH+AH2CXfS+gE6KJPhpz9S1kKrhxjng
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 19:12:36 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB4337994AA5C89060CAEE3E2FC1519@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <162092059520.16031.2606295470570253120@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsw7V4YrsgUf9RR7GOqmTrc9T0gxVs7omF4E34zg0R2RgQ@mail.gmail.com> <8702605F-CF59-4F1E-B4CE-02951B894D1F@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <8702605F-CF59-4F1E-B4CE-02951B894D1F@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2602:306:36ca:6640:ecdc:67c7:5676:c385]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0e624d1a-b327-4ba0-a529-08d9164311e6
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3367:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB33671B68658041701FB194FBC1519@BYAPR11MB3367.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ktRWY0Cb+b9IbHxeT6hghENbYvuByWSyXsLh/4mVMpRqATz+ns46jxYbSHVDbecePGwmEpmlsHMi3t0Ssri7Iqfiwumyxl0aTVsqwNpKMRYHbdDpD9E3vmUqJCLC9HqEwsSOHV4H6NV2gaQ3n2RNBN+ky7u+6ma7pxDqSgpWVXYdCO/ljFnqqi6Ed/uWLZnRCOoH/0idVjmoZXJgtp0fCufhdT7ri7qfFaq2aqGi0gz0xzByJ/RvlYODB2jk4v+BGQVvSCGbHDB1J+GayhNAx0rICFIwXdA0qCpwhHUDr0p/glsgWZdt9Gfu1nPU2HlIZl5FPB8jm6dBB+sa2eYB1/C0pCQ26neKu5otVJ6z3lbDGbklDi/bzjSISlPmwkTIxc9UY5Dc9DvvmFcybqMeriVidp3mzJMF9z0DyaMeoTALqYikWlhZs4hFx1N7RzA7/a2TrenzBn+/idhCgZaT0BTx1uQmi2cRdVtejzcyyv5nK8E9cb4v6fC4VqHV/ZDWfPxS+GV2Qkw1+04vYnoBJCm4wFdyUs4SvcvYjKOM6PU/2ZpFxa/MtINWN7ghi5eB6EQ6RR52sfZWbfSLPZHrYO2/0P68df1sXCcYzzoKTZU=
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(376002)(136003)(346002)(316002)(55016002)(33656002)(38100700002)(83380400001)(122000001)(76116006)(5660300002)(66946007)(9686003)(186003)(8676002)(86362001)(71200400001)(110136005)(478600001)(8936002)(2906002)(7696005)(66556008)(64756008)(4326008)(53546011)(66446008)(52536014)(66476007)(6506007)(54906003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY5PR11MB4337994AA5C89060CAEE3E2FC1519BY5PR11MB4337namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0e624d1a-b327-4ba0-a529-08d9164311e6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 May 2021 19:12:36.6665 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: zClHcpAQt4cAoIUXlk/GWurh2J/Oa8MDAsND4FbtSfv+i32SpG3Ypuf525oPAad5982jp3DEH1vW4oMHB1onmA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3367
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.18, xbe-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/qMxQ7D2e7KM6yXXaPkHWCeGAbzc>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 19:13:59 -0000

Alvaro –

FWIW, I agree w John here.

There are many examples – to cite a few:

Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 25, 141, 222, and 223 (Extended IS reachability, IS Neighbor Attribute, L2 Bundle Member Attributes, inter-AS reachability information, MT-ISN, and MT IS Neighbor Attribute TLVs)
…
Reference
    [RFC5305][RFC5316][RFC7370][RFC8668]

RFC 8868 is not marked as updating RFC 7370.
RFC 7370 is not marked as updating RFC 5316/RFC 5305.

Sub-TLVs for TLVs 135, 235, 236, and 237 (Extended IP reachability, MT IP. Reach, IPv6 IP. Reach, and MT IPv6 IP. Reach TLVs)
…
Reference
    [RFC5305][RFC7370]

Again, RFC7370 is not marked as updating RFC 5305.

I think it is sufficient to request that IANA add the new RFC to the list of References for the modified registry.

   Les


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of John Scudder
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 11:00 AM
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>; Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr-chairs@ietf.org; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)

On May 13, 2021, at 1:20 PM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:

  This documents updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing registry.

Also, this doesn’t seem to me like an update to RFC 7370. It’s normal for an
RFC to update an IANA registry, without saying it updates a previous RFC that
established that registry. I think the “updates” just confuses matters and
clutters things up, and should be removed.

In this case the document is not only registering a value.  It is
changing the name of the registry, adding an extra column, and
updating all the other entries (§11.1.*).  The Updates tag is used
because it significantly changes the registry.

Still seems unnecessary to me, registries are moving targets, citation of all the relevant RFCs in their references should be sufficient. So, the registry would be updated so that it cited both this spec and 7370, and someone wanting to know “how did the registry get this way?” would be able to work it out.

I’m not going to fight about it; the “updates” is not very harmful. I say “not very” because the diligent reader might be led to think they need to go read RFC 7370 in order to properly understand this spec, and waste some time realizing that isn’t true. Since for better or worse we don’t have a firm definition of when we do, and don’t, use “updates”, it comes down to a matter of personal taste in the end.

$0.02,

—John