Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Wed, 06 May 2020 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2463A09F8; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pt2rc_3xqyyW; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A56883A09F5; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2012; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1588767699; x=1589977299; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GRqFxRHqFKm/wrqhAkE6bJHpi9ohQcoXtJJILuT5t8Q=; b=FWkgxky9wdWaKyrovyYAIj3aMXPlb1a8B3wPOBgaW8M5+dum6yezQ4aF 8A0QPlGtOcHBSjC0ogrR6w0bh4f2SsbGfSfQepz6FoaMOIpqIajiqHePk eU07J9YNjsCE/oJrN6QxfR0VBpTB9uIqG3YOOSdzp+E+gG352C4Gzc7Js 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,358,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="25938746"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 May 2020 12:21:37 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.51] (ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com [10.60.140.51]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 046CLZD8030806; Wed, 6 May 2020 12:21:36 GMT
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
References: <158874113658.16071.17054286250715268005@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <4509238f-9aa6-c9c0-ec67-5ad1401dcb10@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 14:21:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158874113658.16071.17054286250715268005@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.51, ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/qjZzBKkJG9z9Bcs1scB7SsIAt30>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 12:21:42 -0000

Hi Barry,

thanks for comments, I fixed them all.

thanks,
Peter


On 06/05/2020 06:58, Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Just a few editorial nits:
> 
> — Section 1 —
> 
>     In cases where LSPs are used (e.g., SR-MPLS [RFC8660], it would be
> 
> Nit: you need a closing parenthesis instead of the second comma.
> 
>     This capability, referred to as Entropy Readable Label
>     Depth (ERLD) as defined in [RFC8662] may be used by ingress LSRs to
> 
> Nit: this needs a comma after the citation.
> 
> — Section 3 —
> 
>     originator.  Similarly in a multi-domain network, the identity of the
> 
> Nit: “Similarly” needs a comma after it.
> 
>     When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS levels ([RFC5302], it
> 
> Nit: remove the open parenthesis.
> 
>     an Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR) is outside of the scope
> 
> Nit: the abbreviation “ASBR” is not used elsewhere in the document, so there’s
> no reason to include it.
> 
> — Section 4 —
> 
>     A new MSD-type [RFC8491], called ERLD-MSD is defined to advertise the
> 
> Nit: 8491 capitalizes the “T” in “MSD-Type”.
> Nit: there needs to be a comma after “ERLD-MSD”.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>