IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 13 August 2019 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCEA120812 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=CSF5zMbv; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=eDd4kZqe
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CFYtfc-nhTeZ for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095CC12080B for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14517; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565708940; x=1566918540; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=S8ZYpYyJii/5jaX6zc1ptPKQbVGOdmjCGMZP53G1a3U=; b=CSF5zMbvxsrU0t4sMh9Z9tKjboKBpF2SvmHGaY75GXwVbTDpSB46Wtgq PnreAdg/sMlHeV33n2hXyXHdl3DautN7N3/8deSi6hctEONIbwmyX6Ohf SIAKbVG2YbBKHetDgTjlFUTXiY7nq7B/rtfHfcL1HVfHk0k5LoVsOUvkl M=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:M02oEh87BzSmQf9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+/YR7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfJq3UeaNpJXh4Bh98RmlkpC8OIIUb6N/XtKSc9GZcKWQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AGAAD00VJd/5xdJa1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUwQBAQEBAQsBgRUvUANtVSAECyqEHoNHA4RShj6CW5MIhFqBLoEkA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYQ/AheCZCM0CQ4BBAEBBAEBBAEKbYUnDIVKAQEBAQIBEgsGHQEBNwEECwIBCBEDAQEBJAQDAgICMBQJCAIEAQ0FIoMAAYEdTQMODwECogUCgTiIYHOBMoJ6AQEFhQIYghQJgTQBi2gXgX+BECgfgh4uPoRkBhCCVTKCJoxrgieFDiOIXo4tCQKCHZQyG5g9jVWYAwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUDiBWHAVGksBgkGCQjiDOoNGhw1ygSmOOwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,381,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="309368049"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Aug 2019 15:08:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7DF8w8P027324 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:08:59 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:08:58 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:08:58 -0500
Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:08:58 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dwaxGtRDhHCRqApLntVaYDTyKbDa/Af+R2/u9LpCNbZByLfsO6eqPAd8u3bId3Y5YGLC3tQ8mJ2u0mjDyJ0ur+Eyy73fIvbdtLCVKvJTVdDmtq01ebzJ+Vg3BkRWiyszfCZPja7F8v7Oo9h09aAqVDvwS0/JHDGauu8drqJwbqz8ggUIlN9bC61JRPubgOeIB2TvHNZ+YvZOgXwft1+Z09p3gXHRK/yOqWLLRHfyVcrqb5uqLnGFZr16S9oLxTZSNrUIPRxgIkotFpivv1NDJk1ejoOrhG7rUTxys7NY5zW3pRri11J+0bNe8ffwr71t/kXKbuGJv2wyUpZKfinzmg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=S8ZYpYyJii/5jaX6zc1ptPKQbVGOdmjCGMZP53G1a3U=; b=lxjkLnDyszkmVQQ4MnxVWfUrFFfEQQXmpDLJ/BhlMjx2UrEq1JtgQ01YfLSU6mVOw+s9vcBdF8Rigu8aXa8p4DjC9gTCAynMgm6Th+GmtdwF/Wxg2Cu/h5uwwVwXQ6IsuVTHbrIuijwoLE0X0osiFYKlx3XPZ/4JpJvOoiHa+9NJbIDPf+lBknDVmQZL6mXpYvvTjWv3d54sWGFiRCUD7lA+J4SIyYaNjCpy2+ClppjQersHaPrOAi8C3pDWe4Q13BpUZOSFRN6fwRoy9a/RWATcRSM9vhu+ahQcWj05K1ILXUZmha6JBKEYanoXzhIMT5WvQ6OVAjVjZaqZPGVd8A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=S8ZYpYyJii/5jaX6zc1ptPKQbVGOdmjCGMZP53G1a3U=; b=eDd4kZqeGHPCxvyfL44UAzuPfSxG2BUmmpCOvNZ2oiWZvxcU0ygOimM1qhSCfkBKFXAHElwtAdkmLRHveoPvlrRDPwD1xCQG+9Ab3JVm8DCyF/vVJyNGbWSYDAG4DQwgqCG/crf52jYzFfdMaNrGB9i9Lxri2pwOq5RAPkb/JMU=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB3696.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.253.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2157.16; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:08:56 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2157.022; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:08:56 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
Thread-Index: AQHVURraLOii8Ni+80mn+fcAdO3zAqb5FxqAgAARWACAAAHQgP//v1gAgABEhsD//76nAA==
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:08:56 +0000
Message-ID: <18E513A0-CFB6-419F-BFC5-6CB47D1D34B1@cisco.com>
References: <8BAFFDB4-62B0-4018-966E-6861D89D0BD1@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMHNaU1o59je5w5HoFXybwr0oO_v9NNs0QpdsjjjWsyGDQ@mail.gmail.com> <6829A426-15CA-47BE-BC42-E125319DFD0F@tony.li> <CAOj+MMErs=WLAVNrEv=ZW-SG4V-pjjgg2Z9oax5UOcBVzLvJUg@mail.gmail.com> <1B3F6353-0429-4D77-AE05-0B3006D51962@cisco.com> <BYAPR11MB36387B4EB9BDF9995B5C5144C1D20@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB36387B4EB9BDF9995B5C5144C1D20@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::93]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 76a4c5f5-efab-475e-d240-08d72000298d
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3696;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3696:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB36964B80A0AC10AD4198A16BC2D20@MN2PR11MB3696.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 01283822F8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(346002)(42274003)(199004)(189003)(71190400001)(6512007)(102836004)(25786009)(6116002)(53936002)(86362001)(66476007)(66556008)(81166006)(64756008)(476003)(71200400001)(316002)(66946007)(5660300002)(6506007)(81156014)(54896002)(53546011)(6306002)(66446008)(76176011)(110136005)(2616005)(99286004)(14454004)(256004)(236005)(33656002)(76116006)(6246003)(186003)(46003)(8936002)(7736002)(36756003)(8676002)(229853002)(6436002)(2906002)(486006)(6486002)(11346002)(4326008)(446003)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3696; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 9HOd3hgmYYc5zNRwcXxA3nnL5y3uTsdZ42hmm0fvgd9O1//7L0AGCcPT4Tw/NnUNnsSkmPsvPWZ+bMFyWcTCfwXxn7tnUl2ku6rXPaoxCvURDTHNuMwMcxPwWyQJ8su+70av1cB/Xok+3uyKlep/JceFKxx92de15gJQoGezen+G2E5Qdarg4X1sjCl2TQXiDEa7WHD2x64iwzq/c+/tIOX0Nk9yvMG9hyzfui2T6Pn9rGsf//mIpsmRj1x+Pr5dLPouq/GCTWeWrsFts8v1YYWiZA9zeJtNdfQlklTHaSDT4efxzaAA/iU5aqmM/L7JgKU+mZD/SmC7SO7r4OmVH6lTGByM/cePvLGoIawSIzErmwbp2yJQQL6SKiLQLrCuNrVpTAh+JGbYHefVYP9ySvCyl3EdairHYqORY/sw29g=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_18E513A0CFB6419FBFC56CB47D1D34B1ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 76a4c5f5-efab-475e-d240-08d72000298d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Aug 2019 15:08:56.4144 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: VkbvCsDolQ1Ysi1QNjuKUKMpLLQeP2yuSbdVj6OaxSm54GIOhLojKVBymr/oyNfS
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3696
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/sw4l82l0dRekMyaSh1yMD1MmZHk>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:09:03 -0000

WFM…

From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 11:04 AM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

Current name:  lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis

(which has too many “isis” in it as well)

Proposed name: lsr-isis-extended-hierarchy

   Les


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 7:58 AM
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>>
Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 10:49 AM
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li>>
Cc: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>, "lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01


> What would you suggest?

How about:  draft-ietf-lsr-n-level-isis-00 ?

I don’t like this – if we are going to split hairs on terminology, I’d suggest “IS-IS Level 3-8 Hierarchy”.
Thanks,
Acee


r.


On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:42 PM <tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li>> wrote:

Robert,

Thank you for your support.  What would you suggest?

Tony


On Aug 13, 2019, at 6:40 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> wrote:

Support.

However assuming the draft will reach rough consensus of support I do recommend to change the title during the conversion to WG document. ISIS is already hierarchical today as even the abstract of the draft clearly says.

Thx,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email