Re: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 06 July 2018 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB375130EF1 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RVWlwHPyKey for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B627130E41 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16628; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1530883237; x=1532092837; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=/5KgZI+4TtT2IPwCZPukLWxEG4KuFw76L2prAFn8mqU=; b=m8FiqPB3PksSbZnROmlplixeKk8xFvGPp2eOg6qO6w/ySOYY2pvOJ6eC FTTHXuvW88H3y1zjMTGh8E/NPnKPqSZWYaHT1E89G2gQLg0IgHD/yF0+1 ADPOUqjgr3NEijoVTYzqPzPym9mNybrautjVZSU+okxbYwGq7sFguG423 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D8AQDM+T5b/4gNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJTdmJ/KAqDcJQ5ggeQIoUOgXoLI4RJAheCFiE1FwECAQECAQECbRwMhTYBAQEBAx0GVhACAQgRAwEBASgDAgICMBQJCAIEAQ0FgyABgRtkD6kVghyIT4E1BYhtghWBDiiCOi6BQYFXAgMBgXwGEIJLMYIkAohOiRyHZQkChgSJHIFAhAyIDIo1hy8CERMBgSQeATYmgSxwFWUBgj4JgieIZIU+b444gRoBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,316,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="138849007"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jul 2018 13:20:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w66DKaSH022589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:20:36 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:20:35 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:20:35 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: "zhuyq@gsta.com" <zhuyq@gsta.com>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "Dailongfei (Larry, IP Research)" <larry.dai@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items
Thread-Index: AQHUFPgnvSgrLZBYwkuC2x7PHsTOFKSCLk6A
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 13:20:35 +0000
Message-ID: <1DB3AD31-AD2F-4BB6-ABD7-A56583E22FD8@cisco.com>
References: <2271245A-3BAF-4E6F-9C6F-790066BBC1A2@cisco.com> <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAC8E0F80@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAC8E0F80@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.202]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1DB3AD31AD2F4BB6ABD7A56583E22FD8ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/tKZQtp-NmbRsf1kv44G5FOaxrrI>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 13:20:40 -0000

Hi Zhibo,

I’m sorry but our agenda is already full for IETF 102. As LSR is one of the most popular WGs, you need to get your requests in early. With respect to this draft, there is already an IS-IS sub-TLV MTU advertisement defined in RFC 7176. While the RFC is specific to TRILL, I don’t see any reason why the sub-TLV couldn’t be used in non-TRILL deploymennts.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>
Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:08 AM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Cc: "zhuyq@gsta.com" <zhuyq@gsta.com>, Robin Li <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "Dailongfei (Larry, IP Research)" <larry.dai@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items

Hi,

Request a slot to discuss ISIS extended for PathMTU:

Drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hu-lsr-isis-path-mtu/
Presenter: ZhiBo Hu

Duration: 10 mins

Thanks!
ZHiBo

From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 9:45 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items

Hi Folks,

The LSR (link-state-routing) WG will be meeting on Monday, July 16, 2018 from 9:30 to 12:00 (the first WG slot of IETF 102).

Please send us (lsr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-chairs@ietf.org>) any requests for presentation slots.

Thanks,
Acee