Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-07

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91BB3A0E21; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:58:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.373, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVjUFYRTZqIb; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:58:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 047AE3A0DFF; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:58:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1661; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1610013529; x=1611223129; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4PtGu4XSV/nesBRInTYQu8ZC/MArPK8jgbQOKIVV0wA=; b=It/+uYIBxx5PWQrOWCtKDsH6huPOBoOho1c0+CAKMOlpcQR1AqqiO9pE mHvWsuI7qospFh/zktBkFPAnBsZbYCvmuk99Ir57U9oGpRHMD4VEEB9Ys gUqY0nSPKOYF997jY2AMzUUSKg8lwlbEwt7OWGj6w2lFBgfs40jIK8IYW 8=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0B8AAAk2vZf/xbLJq1iGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQFAgU+DIVcBIBIuhD+JBIgGLQOcOgsBAQEPIwwEAQGESgKBcCY4EwIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEcYVhDIVzAQEBAQIBHQYVLxIFBwQLEQQBAQECAiYCAk8IBgEMBgIBAYMiAYJmIA+taHaBMoRTQUSDNYE8BoEOKok5g3JBgUE/gREngnI+gl0BAQIBAYRzgmAEgVZuZFECexxvkAWMP5wpgwCDJ4YDj0KCYwUHAx+DKYoshTKPUZMFDH+LFJZQgW0jgVczGggbFTuCaVAZDZcmhUVAAzACBTACBgoBAQMJjCwBAQ
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,329,1602547200"; d="scan'208";a="30033945"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 07 Jan 2021 09:58:44 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.52] (ams-ppsenak-nitro3.cisco.com [10.60.140.52]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1079wimh014649; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 09:58:44 GMT
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, lsr@ietf.org
Cc: lsr-chairs@ietf.org
References: <FD4C69FA-CBDF-4D04-86ED-897A53C4EA0A@chopps.org> <009201d6e49a$f0372290$d0a567b0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <cb3a1820-3c47-bb22-4f04-9a3fc33b0897@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:58:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <009201d6e49a$f0372290$d0a567b0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.52, ams-ppsenak-nitro3.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/uHECKJRdWL0HjIZClDcCxbDYN0c>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:58:51 -0000

Hi Aijun,

On 07/01/2021 03:15, Aijun Wang wrote:
> Hi, Acee and Peter:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8362#section-3.12 has defined the Route-Tag
> Sub-TLV for External-Prefix, is it more straightforward to extend this
> sub-TLV to be included in other Prefix TLVs(Inter-Area-Prefix TLV,
> Intra-Area-Prefix TLV) to accomplish the aimed application scenario?


we can not change the semantics of the existing Route-Tag Sub-TLV as 
defined in rfc8362 - e.g. only single tag is supported.

So we defined a new TLV that carries multiple tags and that is supported 
by Itra-Aare/Inter-Area/External/NSSA Prefix-LSAs for OSPFv3.


> And, do we need to cover multiple tag scenario? Even for external prefix,
> only one Route-Tag will be processed.

that is exactly what the draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags defines, see 
section 3.

thanks,
Peter

> 
> Anyway, I support its adoption.
> 
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lsr-bounces@ietf.org <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Christian
> Hopps
> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 5:17 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-chairs@ietf.org; Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
> Subject: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-07
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft:
> 
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags/
> 
> Please indicate your support or objection by January 19th, 2021.
> 
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any
> IPR that applies to this draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris.
> 
> 
>