Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Wed, 06 May 2020 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA443A09FB; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4yllR-Xidjm; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132463A09F9; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2233; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1588768020; x=1589977620; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aBt9f991E3T2We9cOFsRnmUUVJAkz0LH3iy3EniDo4w=; b=QSFdBIj+oyZxJkUpPygqUtaE/gS/Ddhn16Ly4qffEFqalQheQh1TiMfl PlIFVvXr+AXJMvbH3mQPaBQJzRxsv5mJiw9Ds3EEkSSr8zDjear6fYS3q HpjaNasQhdS32ZNGBDArGomRkWWea74GhgNYB8ROci7i4P6ce2F3/q4Xn 8=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,358,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="25936989"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 May 2020 12:26:58 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.51] (ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com [10.60.140.51]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 046CQvxp031958; Wed, 6 May 2020 12:26:58 GMT
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
References: <158874196172.28072.16634723092281391873@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <633f6cc2-bc0c-d2ce-8d40-0c1fadaaf9e8@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 14:26:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158874196172.28072.16634723092281391873@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.51, ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/uihFwXE1LkpIw4RKCMtaW9RVs6g>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 12:27:03 -0000

Hi Barry,

thanks for your comments. I have fixed all editorial comments.

For the last two comments, Alvaro has already taken care of.

thanks,
Peter


On 06/05/2020 07:12, Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> — Section 1 —
> 
>     In cases where LSPs are used (e.g., SR-MPLS [RFC8660], it would be
> 
> Nit: you need a closing parenthesis instead of the second comma.
> 
>     This capability, referred to as Entropy Readable Label
>     Depth (ERLD) as defined in [RFC8662] may be used by ingress LSRs to
> 
> Nit: this needs a comma after the citation.
> 
> — Section 3 —
> 
>     When an OSPF Area Border Router (ABR) distributes information between
> 
> Nit: the abbreviation “ABR” is not used elsewhere in the document, so there’s
> no reason to include it.
> 
> — Section 3.1 —
> 
>     Prefix TLV includes a one octet Flags field.
> 
> Nit: hyphenate “one-octet” as a compound modifier.
> 
> — Section 4 —
> 
>     The ERLD is advertised in a Node MSD sub-TLV [RFC8476] using the
>     ERLD-MSD type defined in [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc].
> 
> Just checking: is the IS-IS draft the right reference here in this OSPF
> document?



> 
> There does seem to be so much common text between that document and this one
> that I really don’t understand why these (the IS-IS and OSPF signaling) were
> not put into one document, and this reference really drives that home.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>