Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sun, 03 February 2019 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9C612008F for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 09:02:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iOgytfd6ZUgR for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 09:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B918F127598 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 09:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id t33so13126287qtt.4 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 09:02:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+znYmXD8q2NCQZ5BplgND8Ab3YR6hgweM0SY0lJNRLM=; b=bUsoQx/6DSiXpj8SouqSHosI5tX4JmPuNfsyGZS9I6NIlGg7MApf7yTdITwUp2uzW2 QCF08Ou2mptUIvzZh84ZH6GPrOCF9ZheOzjKvtQpJgSfPQjmQ7qk2qrs/EakoJ1mrGev JRm0ucWbobLsZLbEUNP2dEXmVxtD6Rzp0ltYonGwCuXtaFOR0mfN6dM04lpV8SHOSR62 lsmCYxhMMIPttRKctXfrIyk3AC1sIpkOfPwDv1A89k8mePu8TYA/V88ecYUm5/HH9H16 dNNtTw1yUdmOFzWGlJnJDPMtEk92E299VWTSaJbtFgdU5i+ghF3XR6Nw7YmGC49ReJ0V Rd1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+znYmXD8q2NCQZ5BplgND8Ab3YR6hgweM0SY0lJNRLM=; b=mjdUPwnAk81QtpPcnw4e6uF3CpBfS0AxvtzRcTLZMrTPcpj/KT086AZdcM5VhHlKvu ZQsuTsHMmyuUDN/aZyG/kEz9PMBzW6KJncDX8GUs+f0uEy6znqxQVKaN+G8Y18PyLByW HpHZGoP83/5OrGP26g6kXk9ep36mQZ46Z6i+bNBFyg/BXFfFwYnA/fUMLS1s4BZnBFyR dk+Sbd/9TY5xn8Bn7CF9nzK+8+PhzERZ7Q2XC2ARqeVhoKV6fm1BzH5kfsFKcYA+8iFr Yd67J3s1Idmm1G7pWQ/WnfL4pFD8L66mOKgSIpYfCkxMy73t/uPCeGNzH5Q3NVEmGa6B frnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdZxD/f+QIhizlv4XcmxvX4joftiIIWxyj0Gmo5see67ue0mF9l Qi6aZmoxm9g+hBGLwNkIKgPQGqOhzsam5CJxd2Kesw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7Qvwi8nOo7x86nthRbXFqo4a/edLypEP3AWtrwqsn8RtAQLKaY5M1GZLbBbDy4+mY04E9gIaQNhMUU+GIFYSQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:baa8:: with SMTP id x40mr45513044qvf.18.1549213320733; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 09:02:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <sa65zu31zqk.fsf@chopps.org> <sa64l9n1yqy.fsf@chopps.org> <CAOj+MMHVzuhfUNB+U_wLZ6M1KSPzJ_UNNAMwO0q5t9N3BoVoyQ@mail.gmail.com> <SG2PR06MB23139237E9A2CB6918C571C2FC6C0@SG2PR06MB2313.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR15MB34394D9C30E039673757ABEDD06C0@MN2PR15MB3439.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D463B462E0@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D463B462E0@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 18:01:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEwLFPy_fCLHC7XXCLbaYX=O8wDSpXe4ALUh9L24ZvAGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
Cc: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>, "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, "chopps@chopps.org" <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a9f7d1058100550a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/vEPUCFs-iKDrhhEXBTLrO-QcZbQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 17:02:04 -0000

> The former will have all the good parts for the centralized solution, and
the latter will have all the good parts for the distributed solution.

And in your view which draft should contain required protocol extensions to
accommodate both solutions ?

Or are you suggesting that we should have completely different protocol
extensions for distribution of centralized computed graphs vs for
propagating parameters allowing customized distributed computation of
partial flooding topology ?

Thx,
R.


On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 5:44 PM Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
> There are two drafts containing the centralized solution and distributed
> solution already on the table too. If the two drafts are adopted, they need
> to be updated for one draft to focus on the centralized solution and the
> other on the distributed solution. The former will have all the good parts
> for the centralized solution, and the latter will have all the good parts
> for the distributed solution.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Huaimo
>
>