Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 13 August 2019 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9E512082F for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=TWpOiFXm; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Hbk5zlk1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJh8dPBJVIiS for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A7F112024E for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9157; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565708259; x=1566917859; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=55RWkR81a5xax7T3N4pdFmNYRocsxP8VQXWBhACBOuA=; b=TWpOiFXmcj10MT+2sr84TKCudZMRwwrxa/hKb60tYiWPKMQbRQlCvfUo 97wEEk5ST+rVnSKiweDiBfeuKPkBigPCgJCEyw9Ua+Lk8jbGY1dkPiGbZ P31DAdPiTWFwtAQVwD2iWUVm2Yfk+yE19A25yOEHgwMrAuBgx/4h8caB7 Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A8sbL8hEXoBLVcsC6tFIBM51GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4w0Q3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0ETB?= =?us-ascii?q?oZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBjyJ/PnRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AOAAAkz1Jd/4QNJK1mGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVQIBAQEBAQsBgRUvUANtVSAECyqEHoNHA4sQgjYlkwi?= =?us-ascii?q?EWoEugSQDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBhD8CF4JkIzYHDgEEAQEEAQEEAQpthScMhUo?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAgESCwYdAQE3AQQLAgEIEQMBAiQEAwICAjAUCQgCBAENBSKDAAGBHU0?= =?us-ascii?q?DDg8BAqF+AoE4iGBzgTKCegEBBYUCGIIUCYE0AYtoF4F/gRAoDBOCHi4+hGQ?= =?us-ascii?q?GEIJVMoImjGuCJ4UOiQGOLQkCgh2UMhuYPY1VmAMCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVcELYF?= =?us-ascii?q?YcBUaSwGCQYJCOIM6g0aHDXKBKY47AQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,381,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="314634246"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Aug 2019 14:57:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7DEvcUS003012 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:57:38 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:57:37 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:57:37 -0500
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:57:36 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gDya2EJFtKlvVDR24vrLnqTHKBHLakBdmkldE0zv1EXUt2mEADxdEIEEHuQdaxCtfH4rloewXTdFiZh9yIfff/MdQ5jSPw+69erSTpj7Ed1BauqTZfb12jlKrq0bUsGIdMLVNI6xy3fF7Nmaus8SH0rAolY0jUpTdszRu1ItyPID5RyNhV2J2hTMeUWSoRHXGHd9ML043KGWyLJ1wPzbwhazp+6TuHUCcfAPUTmeAEEu0tY1erDn93xBVtALIpctN34YoAsent8onxuuDvRPfNQ70o1sX6/VpohbCgV7GrFB6S9hc4OdcR5N46AGcaDN8NCV22EmB0mbw6eTNJGxJg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=55RWkR81a5xax7T3N4pdFmNYRocsxP8VQXWBhACBOuA=; b=m58XowKWCe4if7yoUTJiOepo9CpD5+JwJx3NfCLg+8/VbYo4bwoTSZ+w+Ll8PiXDfjnlIW5EXJWAMtn6aYpuBAUON/qfcFPe+wGKGProAcTTOOUWmQWdr2KM9PUaZA7IpJCcLK5LKGJqw7GntwB/6iRzTcPg+g7n+wwozp+cdzMbd+3EA/oY/gdr0rMEmBVJHTr0f/xdtZQtZh9Xvx4I4NQMGJ8RcEyBWHLSKoVXlrARzTOVXdPOwsakVE74UxjXhNr0aFuDKDT5mbkZVuoo0PgQ7TU/eBokEFGVCrT0BzctHNdfdfHm0+qVGqwU561P+aVA5mUVZbdoFvfsb2ekWQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=55RWkR81a5xax7T3N4pdFmNYRocsxP8VQXWBhACBOuA=; b=Hbk5zlk1IVSZmPXWVodlvfXzXqQlK6txkedDteC0yddmsrQe4jEbZb1w480Fyhh3w0Z+1Rd0cSZgwJLaSz/Tcncr3K/u/SXyHipdN2P5ANOdBGCQe0F22j/mKNcfWNsBkiFt+gZAChHPx5IrH3ZZqUiYDnPSbCUmVUvgKGe4Ruc=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB3664.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.252.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2157.20; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:57:35 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2157.022; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:57:34 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
Thread-Index: AQHVURraLOii8Ni+80mn+fcAdO3zAqb5FxqAgAARWACAAAHQgP//v1gA
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:57:34 +0000
Message-ID: <1B3F6353-0429-4D77-AE05-0B3006D51962@cisco.com>
References: <8BAFFDB4-62B0-4018-966E-6861D89D0BD1@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMHNaU1o59je5w5HoFXybwr0oO_v9NNs0QpdsjjjWsyGDQ@mail.gmail.com> <6829A426-15CA-47BE-BC42-E125319DFD0F@tony.li> <CAOj+MMErs=WLAVNrEv=ZW-SG4V-pjjgg2Z9oax5UOcBVzLvJUg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMErs=WLAVNrEv=ZW-SG4V-pjjgg2Z9oax5UOcBVzLvJUg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::93]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 23c99213-2820-49c8-50a7-08d71ffe934d
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3664;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3664:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB36646C8231222EA0F1D55C7DC2D20@MN2PR11MB3664.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 01283822F8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(42274003)(199004)(189003)(46003)(76176011)(110136005)(478600001)(186003)(76116006)(66946007)(71190400001)(66446008)(25786009)(66556008)(66476007)(53936002)(2616005)(11346002)(6246003)(446003)(64756008)(6506007)(102836004)(14454004)(2906002)(236005)(476003)(71200400001)(53546011)(486006)(81166006)(256004)(316002)(6486002)(81156014)(54896002)(6306002)(8676002)(4326008)(5660300002)(33656002)(4744005)(7736002)(8936002)(36756003)(229853002)(6512007)(6116002)(86362001)(99286004)(6436002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3664; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: eVEMGlWBsz0fWeipg9pZo0CMhEl/CH+yo46rzvrJl4j7Ebw2tdep8i30Wh2YvBj05rQY3JX467rZZrO3oiMyzqUUz7k3nWtjbPK9PqPbZTkXuwVixU3zwL2qiJL8aYzRFt6cVJwQ6ueNWH86VQYvSl1xqOX2dQna15W5Ypl/elIfCHIbGb1IJDbwCOPm+1MUWHWB8DaipT9tfMc6+uT3z87TkHv6F2LLRykPnZilFx9NHji9Yj7eFHnyzGl1MKgzCJ0/yjL2KzJh+XGSSXhYFuSSW+IKSOMEM24hxkPEMOLeNzG7Z392svR17VVTOBxyDnuUojKuUPaq5VwTuKIYJGTf5tlasn8xIL4bWAD2ViI+AS/qjLK+p5GjC2Rf9evc0QW+wN73gbx/74lHhOJgVL8lP4nGW5tegkM1dweSZs4=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1B3F635304294D77AE050B3006D51962ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 23c99213-2820-49c8-50a7-08d71ffe934d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Aug 2019 14:57:34.7847 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: SUEs4HT8BEZi0kiAOlPOeej29JqlFFCqxaWGb4XRW6yTiDi4hpKQd6IVhzGl8Ugu
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3664
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/vRrpm5FkgBjr7UAf4ViouvcagLY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:57:42 -0000

From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 10:49 AM
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>om>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01


> What would you suggest?

How about:  draft-ietf-lsr-n-level-isis-00 ?

I don’t like this – if we are going to split hairs on terminology, I’d suggest “IS-IS Level 3-8 Hierarchy”.
Thanks,
Acee


r.


On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:42 PM <tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li>> wrote:

Robert,

Thank you for your support.  What would you suggest?

Tony



On Aug 13, 2019, at 6:40 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> wrote:

Support.

However assuming the draft will reach rough consensus of support I do recommend to change the title during the conversion to WG document. ISIS is already hierarchical today as even the abstract of the draft clearly says.

Thx,
R.