Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 04 March 2021 13:28 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832B93A08A5 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 05:28:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TrtmbtGFsnlH for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 05:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DF2A3A0887 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 05:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id p21so43127945lfu.11 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 05:28:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Vm41NMjJNIy5wd5h1KM5S+jTsv/VovYqzaY5+uhcUHE=; b=CkdARSQgWCkW2ZpiejXQEDV98wTKrhYxm9FPSN8ItLEGVOBVrg1cs9vi8sfQGCtgV0 Lt3soc5Xk4cr2W9BQi04qjyKEFZlFliFajIj29HCbfcW5D5Hcylx3UwTIbV4gMY2keaH eIAOVjtB6hIn7NXrX3oPD9tfxKB67vcSf+Z3VajfK+iOg6Q/jkCpgY1hXAxj6sT0k0JE VbDLAqBiDjnyAvyUSQpwxkHCkEllwYj97pVJWAmgb0n9OMf1MQpCQDuX3vOBb8TvHpt9 bSTx3p+g6fJZo7F/CvAnm6UC2OqRNp4DioEDn2VwL5jbJitonwXnLUyh1WK6cR/4Q3sX 7Row==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Vm41NMjJNIy5wd5h1KM5S+jTsv/VovYqzaY5+uhcUHE=; b=pftmwyh2WEFVi5hiew23bKLI2TFRauxNS7UHzjoph+dmN/hRySgAhQ6CeeRIsPNmff /4l07EZJUGCsjEPghEel+5lmghCFwHShkEW35le1f85/JN1bbuklGDb4GcODMr01B/CH pBABHvJGsDuYhuFtKSu/FoIIO1Uyu9CqX+U6ydpQhC7J8TqGDgb9nbUeSwWW8aJG9b6/ KK/1yrfZQGKGC4XE67llTnJw8yZ7AnyrsT6F133sRRSJQLu+VTQXkZzfH0WdCh880ajC zT7FHB3JICOZugwzCZpvFzmVGatoNissZfUMO5f9ukvwyPUGYPokIkAgEc3LA53NVaMa b3VA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530E6RdHkIEclhF1n6i1itH9YTyukoNg44DJlJXpUGxC7Xj2v4xo f1+OEw1Me4AlPXC3v9uJWZPZrd7UAVim5cODtk150g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz2THnJVw76LgekIUA7+SVT6956kdJn5SaxTBMhTCjTY75bzwDIs2OReckVlR1mrDv+17JGi5JOw0A09d3p6CY=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:d8:: with SMTP id 207mr1930196lfa.602.1614864522497; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 05:28:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161401476623.19237.3808413288895066510@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOj+MMGZppwYtNr4t0rJoy3BKWaBYqHiJ_esM1XNFTNxbm8c5w@mail.gmail.com> <08882555-009B-4068-ABB0-20B0D165D722@tony.li> <2c2605a8-95c6-a477-b1b5-5ae4d4de222a@cisco.com> <52B3A5ED-6ACC-4772-BEF7-085A33A53F31@tony.li> <e5190522-3a8b-2d6e-c2fe-646049689cc4@cisco.com> <1EABA651-2F05-415B-97EF-054507FADEAC@tony.li> <f935dbc4-6220-5f47-65a4-f642823f594f@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMHXd5j8B9a13E90HQVB=SUOkQ=fqhyJEgTf-Y7Tp5eiBQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d66e5af-414a-42b7-6af5-388974785b8f@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMGggyuzqD=ZbDxNG_10ThHykOO7y5rYWphvSk0rs+4CbQ@mail.gmail.com> <bb9555c4-8007-4d0e-2715-39c4069fc61f@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMFP+Tx13v99GaOc8vQaN6UPkSiS7UX1hRFwevKd8Oj13Q@mail.gmail.com> <532100cf-0252-73f3-046c-218de2fc26db@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMEYAc=LN6JfTto7fwcSzeQuyUdeTTC262c5LwBfPFgRRg@mail.gmail.com> <f21c7460-86ff-6169-1bf8-3e95e843e9df@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMHtFS3X7G622ik3q3uy46M=49dY3gQ60X8pCxNyga9QLw@mail.gmail.com> <528e48f4-3fa9-c9bb-b707-3c451aa05eac@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <528e48f4-3fa9-c9bb-b707-3c451aa05eac@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:28:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFwgMM+hVn-ahdRhEbOhJNN1tyGNCqT1banMYUW6D9Xmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Rajesh M <mrajesh@juniper.net>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, William Britto A J <bwilliam=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003964dd05bcb5f23f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/vfmq2QF35dc-bfWMOQF566Dl9-U>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 13:28:48 -0000
> > Is it minimum ever, is it min of the year, month, week, day ... etc > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8570#section-4.2 > > Peter > Maybe it is just me but in section 4.2 I see NOTHING about how often that delay should be measured which was the point above. Thx, R.
- [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Const… William Britto A J
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… William Britto A J
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… William Britto A J
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… William Britto A J
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… William Britto A J