Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 28 September 2019 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB007120019; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=AQSECewc; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=dbdfz0jJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LtF-UMudXhkV; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6E6120025; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=19163; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1569695286; x=1570904886; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=rVyipzuYY6roezWrSQ4KEP2oYjHYGnAMlZ6Ng63AW0I=; b=AQSECewcKPzXWSZzHLu0kx6FrYudr+3Q+px3q1q5FdxTh1pYsIxyyfEd ZbDy8HeO8s1vBD6qVLh0irVmWAWH/+o4tUxtmMTDIfZQ123Apo7qssc9/ mxjbJrakuKcEeLAvNftr451exZiEpp8jLTMn61v+HTKi1vFWwIi+PK1Fx E=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ARRozRhEYB5vH7p5rekNlGJ1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4w0Q3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0ETB?= =?us-ascii?q?oZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBjyJ/PnRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D3AAC9pY9d/4QNJK1mGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEMAgEBAQGBZ4EcL1ADbVYgBAsqhCKDRwOKV4JciWeJMIRfglIDVAkBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?MAQEtAgEBhEACF4MgIzgTAgMJAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FLQyFSwEBAQQSER0BATc?= =?us-ascii?q?BDwIBCA4DAwECKAMCAgIfERQJCAIEAQ0FIoMAAYEdTQMdAQKiMQKBOIhhdYE?= =?us-ascii?q?ygn0BAQWFCg0LghcJgTSMDhiBf4ERJx+CTD6CGoJKFoJVMoImjFSCUjeFLSS?= =?us-ascii?q?JBI4oQQqCIpEJBIN+G5k2jiGKIo59AgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIYFYcBVlAYJBUBA?= =?us-ascii?q?UgU44gzqKU3SBKYxjAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,560,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="334309508"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 28 Sep 2019 18:28:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (xch-rcd-010.cisco.com [173.37.102.20]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8SIS4kX028094 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 18:28:04 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (173.37.102.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:28:04 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:28:03 -0500
Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:28:03 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=H5xGqSOLBrtT7FzP5uk8y1Y6ghhy4VC2PP0ZQHcSJBNehR57s0uEWpN3wKMZ9N1jKuznPnaF1LwHwPXjsrsecoyFp2uX9e2avWy9yjkMEdQi9DSKUyD8Czn8ncHN0+QVB2m8ar2vwHobh6C5fkUV30aPOPsSk6k/XqJpNcqCFR+glbvJ9KDQqxq2qVvMF4E58qi2RR8nH6m+vD6GI2HA0l3g/7oOdDzLpq3awz7Zhbl3BGnu49OJnSXsgdNfWNws45CWa9vZHfsjPkuh3irg1MO4uDzsRR53/Azm0Y5iTG4vXvuy0EN/43YAzen8RSIyZTsME2v73sUPaBlJt5UBbQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rVyipzuYY6roezWrSQ4KEP2oYjHYGnAMlZ6Ng63AW0I=; b=bxX4hxw4g6q5I480hHpseh44kpZdmwgIrA+3g7YE6mDIGP9/IlXLOex0xxV6lgVNtIIXGxs+hDA8QGsu1IvyC6NnuOcRiiJPfYUBfmYzkiRYZHiPq0BATEHmYcUq0IJW6aCLjFmZWKQF7/IvI4DRgLaFA/cJGecJy9+NxUCbZ4ItJVlQrZUqDbcAEHaGCw5hk6J45tQTS207FC9ArlKESi+LXDUCU7wSUjYjaiyKFBl1WSOYfttBCkajfLtxgjXH6rTDoPhpW0Z4eWcLTzM3ZlYeJccrATCuSwg7qDprG+nc7lAinmIl6lmre+KU84qHKl7z9U8HDXys3m6lHRKqag==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rVyipzuYY6roezWrSQ4KEP2oYjHYGnAMlZ6Ng63AW0I=; b=dbdfz0jJaEkAhupKjjCLLvUN7Ri0ngVBHdz+rSAid1z1pGho4xsoCg5bNchzo5JmVKccbHeLUJRt/+JsGTV6/1GbCJN6r3kN2BZq4O+l9OW7jb0IlIH4OUMeuXsfSQg6HB0DJpfgZEqnY0/Spn8q2UYLSxgiFKPuD1KFtCL6Z5A=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB4255.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.37.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.20; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 18:28:02 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdc1:a2cf:eb3:a420]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdc1:a2cf:eb3:a420%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2284.028; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 18:28:02 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVdCyKKy08Wh2SU0mNM2b0foRlHac+mRYAgACaKoCAAfZCAA==
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 18:28:01 +0000
Message-ID: <F781B724-B375-4EB4-8D40-F18D1C116877@cisco.com>
References: <156947626551.29034.6816443991581677055.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsxSQg0LT4cruL8uX2Bf8TdVH3zRy+BMrdTGuE=_dyezrg@mail.gmail.com> <370E1315-20A4-4948-8488-393F7B64570D@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <370E1315-20A4-4948-8488-393F7B64570D@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1003::69]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f0d96364-b85d-4365-9da8-08d7444198ac
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4255:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB42552DFFF27A495ED10B92DAC2800@MN2PR11MB4255.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4303;
x-forefront-prvs: 0174BD4BDA
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(4636009)(376002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(7736002)(2906002)(6512007)(6306002)(54896002)(6486002)(99286004)(316002)(229853002)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(236005)(6436002)(76116006)(110136005)(86362001)(54906003)(14454004)(8936002)(478600001)(4326008)(256004)(8676002)(81166006)(81156014)(71200400001)(71190400001)(476003)(2616005)(33656002)(53546011)(6506007)(76176011)(25786009)(102836004)(186003)(5660300002)(36756003)(446003)(6246003)(11346002)(6116002)(486006)(46003)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4255; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: LbxhUYM1OWrIQZu16Egfp1j3lplvxdf7zLaZ1/5fy/6XyhRP0/GMUaqYFAQS6BwYTpx+BAj/MH8zX2hpGflF7w/GKdSV5XPguJLwRWBFrd2rqIP0w9gCS/SM2025UOAYWZb8uNz42c8w9t3NPON5pYUYESIoObUSTiymR4ch1hgYDnybEsXtu1jDX2YCjku8kdF7uol+Rc56S2oMvK++pDZNgjFiIeVhtDpbrUJz9CftogDcPYqGkZJe2wyKOiEfb0brUwvSmE6Au+qBA4wPvGFWVv8kMUIsmNjOWHBxo2rUmDIzD0QaOlBdm9xeaMo6fGV6xoWyqjjfRogHPyfZopRcSMRFbELcf53aIywfuKGwttD31IwGR4JaUBZNeQE1T1E6mmkEziVeVZpEE5bHcIm1dSuy0biMBfRoJ30/Lnk=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F781B724B3754EB48D40F18D1C116877ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f0d96364-b85d-4365-9da8-08d7444198ac
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Sep 2019 18:28:01.8698 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: c3h4o/ELumdAOdQ3yeo9XOlO+m4fEeLb73YiE7yqcWYiotlFMFw+ZO7wHMTrYLCR
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4255
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.20, xch-rcd-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/wEH-t9q8_c5WSIVuOlrJ3-PAfjM>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 18:28:09 -0000

Hi Alvaro, Co-authors, et al,
I went ahead and changed to “should” for the YANG deviations as well as fixing a couple typos and changing the draft short name from “isis-cfg” to “isis-yang”. The -40 version is posted.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;
Date: Friday, September 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>;, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>;
Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org"; <draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org>;, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org"; <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>;, "lsr@ietf.org"; <lsr@ietf.org>;, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>;, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
Subject: Re: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>;
Resent-To: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>;, Derek Yeung <derek@arrcus.com>;, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;, Jeffrey Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net>;, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>;
Resent-Date: Friday, September 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM

Hi Alvaro,

From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>;
Date: Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 7:18 PM
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>;, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;
Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org"; <draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org>;, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org"; <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>;, "lsr@ietf.org"; <lsr@ietf.org>;, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>;, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
Subject: Re: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>;
Resent-To: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>;, Derek Yeung <derek@arrcus.com>;, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;, Jeffrey Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net>;, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>;
Resent-Date: Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 7:18 PM

On September 26, 2019 at 1:37:47 AM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker (noreply@ietf.org<mailto:noreply@ietf.org>) wrote:

Acee:

Hi!

— Section 2.3 —
In the last two paragraphs of the section, one uses “should” advertise and the
other uses “SHOULD” advertise. They should either both be BCP 14 key words, or
both not.

In this case, instead of the change to “SHOULD” (which you made in -38), we need to go the other way: s/SHOULD/should

This is from my AD review:

- - - -
...
506   If an implementation does not support per level configuration for a
507   parameter modeled with per level configuration, the implementation
508   SHOULD advertise a deviation to announce the non-support of the
509   level-1 and level-2 containers.

511   Finally, if an implementation supports per level configuration but
512   does not support the level-1-2 configuration, it SHOULD also
513   advertise a deviation.

[major] "SHOULD advertise a deviation"  According to rfc7950: "Deviations MUST never be part of a published standard"; I realize that this document doesn't include one, but it Normatively recommends their use.  s/SHOULD/should
- - - -

I missed in -36 the fact that only the first SHOULD was changed.

You’d think I would have remembered that. I will make both “should” I the -40 revision. -39 simply updated Stephane’s contact info to avoid bounces during IESG review.

Thanks,
Acee




Thanks!

Alvaro.