Re: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-09.txt

Alvaro Retana <> Fri, 20 September 2019 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A951208BF for <>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KdOOk_k_Yarj for <>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B013120099 for <>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id l21so2756098edr.5 for <>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bNiL2P9MD9/NGGm1sn7RsbC3DeFeb6t12CCkBa79VNE=; b=sf+enRxkkaBFrFzAfTh/H6PhZbAWWxxmpDNp4C1smcuWjrnARqEUqa4kxkDQ7dj65G eIy4GaBz1bxuHqvjnimaPV/L1uoqCTZrzY4qjto1b0y2z46aFD/FyLWNzzz5ixd91Rg/ 2/WoVH+Jy4I/DmPPUWQgqvPq7P1grjdugc/E5rwYi/CLl/EfkvMmWg98et9oDSU7x8bd oJBmKeZbJ2m6XZh33bRoTFobctUELCZhqQPVmBEoyQ63uQ16FWwaib62lMYdwidVY4XU HevvXwX2u3OIxEMQZcH3YcRjsqhL4rsfptG8zE5XkJqGoftClfqP70lIFdACZNpdCXha 0c4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bNiL2P9MD9/NGGm1sn7RsbC3DeFeb6t12CCkBa79VNE=; b=IbdAYnobKcqW84kERjajHO0t4lfW8YOYyR/N862zHz4NMkLo8JyhiVgujpccp5H+CB 7lwzt19L8WzVA1KzP63I5CD4b//aIhnbKUyvjQaedUmQthsMpETvCSVhOqx2qm8WZfID MVkL7CqwMVj0IlOMgPQ2SXflHr0WBcnCJ7R/zI/Q5OrAj4PHvilAoLcYs3LtBKgN1Ly8 znFfOThFuqzhewEJp+ZrNLxA0sfZ7S+JASAPG44V9g5HG+OLgkXbbER5w2iaDTsKUPTj 2S5O46MRg1CXKTL4BmFtXhEM6Sx9NqXXr+FDYtzmRvDngOLK7zh/YpujG3ZNP9kp9QsA aoGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV1NicKUY414xCnoNbKFeNHJWvYYvYqnMYXnod14M1B1/xeMzj8 OzNoHC6yXbzrdT66v5a9pEjlaJiIPvg6ug1vVvcSIK9O
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwgfiBBWhbRgalD6pLF1g7X0ltU3wmLUGvvpJ56R4pfoDBrpZQM9aCQhK4pMVFT0IiI8rcgnmCd4B8HjtLWntA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fc2:: with SMTP id c2mr4755772ejk.261.1569010231852; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:10:31 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:10:31 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: "" <>
Cc: Yingzhen Qu <>,, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <>, Keyur Patel <>, "Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)" <>, Padma Pillay-Esnault <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000084c105059301a9e6"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-09.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:10:36 -0000

[Simply adding the WG to keep everyone in the loop.]

On September 14, 2019 at 1:12:51 AM, Padma Pillay-Esnault ( wrote:

Hi Alvaro

FYI  the draft is posted.

Sending in attachment here
- the diffs between -06 version and -09 version for your convenience.
- while you asked me not necessary to respond, Acee asked for the
responses... therefore I have added it  in attachment here for  Acee's
As it is long and would get truncated on alias ....


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <>;
Date: Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:56 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-09.txt
To: Serpil Bayraktar <>;, Padma Pillay-Esnault <>;, Manish Bhardwaj <>;, Keyur Patel <>;

A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-09.txt
has been successfully submitted by Padma Pillay-Esnault and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit
Revision:       09
Title:          Host Router Support for OSPFv2
Document date:  2019-09-13
Group:          lsr
Pages:          10

   The Open Shortest Path First Version 2 (OSPFv2) does not have a
   mechanism for a node to repel transit traffic if it is on the
   shortest path.  This document assigns a new bit (Host-bit) in the
   OSPF Router-LSA bit registry and in the OSPF Router Informational
   Capability Bits Registry that enables a host router to advertise that
   it is a non-transit router.  It also describes the changes needed to
   support the Host-bit in the domain.  In addition, this document
   updates OSPF Stub Router Advertisement (RFC6987) to advertise for
   type-2 External and NSSA LSAs with a high cost in order to repel
   traffic effectively.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at

The IETF Secretariat