IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] On collaboration for abstraction

tony.li@tony.li Fri, 03 April 2020 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135A63A1944 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGUrvyDZYm8P for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3BB03A1962 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id 22so3642413pfa.9 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=aWnu2/xqfkhgGIWOYcvF2AoURndkCgAPTpUjBAZitdk=; b=nVwNZqkb0sBNyiVaMQhoIUmU45QVuGXW2RzbUaKtwigvNp3r6YUqLhHa2mND38qVGF /gh9r6tSVJR4yVNEog2vnWy5inVlJY2XTvRJaP8a2jUYfvpbE3YnCIfL8ezvC3KSCWQV z4tQw3lbV5gsjKUqJPubNo/IIYxx9ETCbaYD10+ylo8DmVG+jlaiAxN3VvQZFv2EXaG6 ovQRCtlZwTr8a6kOsH9WET+JUq8tJAPLvZoX39tqW2Qq4NZuh9BoKnipyqxvbM0DAqXx sOgqh7F7gIMCqecNHO2fYq9Jk+xor3KVAZYjW8HBV30O+w+TuAG6uhoukEP8zHJ2GL2r y/tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=aWnu2/xqfkhgGIWOYcvF2AoURndkCgAPTpUjBAZitdk=; b=AUFf3UP9V531f26LEJlvALCykZErXjPHfOBcwFaZCAC0yes4/m7fetF4UrfuVCOie3 e6kN1b/0Xb6Ii7HiXZT052t0FEgRYigF/fa6xYzoY/PrHxrQ7NbA+xiF5tvg5hn3QbH7 5YSv5JKcKhFKFJa1iFr4AlPSZe8erQJKz3JANapU5oJc7TOSR5EuiHFDhSgBJ6ow1Ekp E0UA6O0dAm76Wst+5Ev/g/7XodfeoYXC/aDUYClIYotzFMm4MeDWfZoIL4nSFOFp0a+Z 4O5MOm1pvKtG6kEy8W89IqZwunlK5P8arjzAKcnN1QxO4903sBFrXV9DdXmlOadyZYha tZiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaBA2mNuGel8iVlIdiSTCfBNUTe6FBtpg23ILhQacwiIAsD73SP DMy8shkfMTNFzatpH5O1+UE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKewtHcC5ZllhVadeHyXyeK/okpZqvjXi9fFyKzL6OKhmKY4TxQTrobidbeUWzVTUEHzEnQCA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:ce48:: with SMTP id y69mr8948439pfg.178.1585929154340; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.24] (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 93sm6310806pjo.43.2020.04.03.08.52.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: tony.li@tony.li
In-Reply-To: <etPan.5e871130.5f6bd8ba.16937@futurewei.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:52:32 -0700
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2FB0A34-6D11-4589-8335-0603A909B181@tony.li>
References: <99212C6C-6158-47EB-975C-5658F2E3F22B@tony.li> <etPan.5e871130.5f6bd8ba.16937@futurewei.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <alvaro.retana@futurewei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/wqtxn9UFdJYJV1RedqWoU-psWCQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] On collaboration for abstraction
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:52:42 -0000

Hi Alvaro,


> Having official and open meetings is the way to go.


I concur.


> An alternative would be for the group to work as a Design Team: the discussions can happen in the lsr list, periodic open calls can be scheduled...without some of the administrative overhead.  The DT could include others (non-authors) for moderation and coordination, and anyone/everyone would be able to participate.


I have some concerns about how this would be perceived. A Design Team is traditionally a small subset of the WG, with intentionally bounded membership. Describing this as a Design Team would seem to give the wrong impression and I would feel uncomfortable participating in this without lawyers present.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email