IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7810 (5293)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 22 March 2018 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF601200C5 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4_J5K6IS07J for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A109124235 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4342BB810BC; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
To: sprevidi@cisco.com, spencer.giacalone@gmail.com, wardd@cisco.com, jdrake@juniper.net, sunseawq@huawei.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, chopps@chopps.org, hannes@gredler.at
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: jhaas@juniper.net, lsr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180322104541.4342BB810BC@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:45:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/x5DlcGmwMPf9hvgL6mofNqGpbQA>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:49:01 -0700
Subject: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7810 (5293)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:45:53 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7810,
"IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5293

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>

Section: 4.5-4.7

Original Text
-------------
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Type        |     Length    |  RESERVED     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          Residual Bandwidth                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   where:

   Type: 37

   Length: 4

   RESERVED: This field is reserved for future use

Corrected Text
--------------
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Type        |     Length    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          Residual Bandwidth                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   where:

   Type: 37

   Length: 4



Notes
-----
In sections 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7, a RESERVED field is in the diagram and the text.  However, the length field of each of these TLVs is 4.  The RESERVED field is thus not present and should be removed in future editions of this document.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7810 (draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions
Publication Date    : May 2016
Author(s)           : S. Previdi, Ed., S. Giacalone, D. Ward, J. Drake, Q. Wu
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IS-IS for IP Internets
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email