[Lsr] Regarding SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV in draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8F83A0C33; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 04:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jjVU8itRVK8p; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D19F3A0C30; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DCFDFDA9172D6F0993FD; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:51:08 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:51:08 +0100
Received: from DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.33) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:51:08 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.142]) by DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::74d9:c659:fbec:21fa%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:51:00 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV in draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions
Thread-Index: AdZIiOHfUYX5hDH2T0exeWmJR7G7SwAAmr5w
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:50:59 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02AB0198@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.203.229]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02AB0198dggeml529mbxchi_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/xJskZJSq2V29mGJYRRncUSs_oVQ>
Subject: [Lsr] Regarding SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV in draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:51:12 -0000

Hi authors,

When I read the document, I noticed that the format of the SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV has no reserved bits, which may bring troubles for future extensions.

What if new architecture of SID is proposed? We have to introduce a new SID structure TLV. But actually a backward-compatible format design of this TLV can solve this kind of problems.

IMHO, if we introduced 16 bits reserved bits after the Length, then the length aligns with  64 bits and the future SID structure can be supported.


[cid:image002.jpg@01D648CD.39194020]

Thanks,
Cheng