IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Prefix Unreachable Announcement Use Cases

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Fri, 20 November 2020 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDE23A109B for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:09:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id du-B_9LFYerW for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216F63A1093 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id i18so11224368ioa.3 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:09:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2X+GPLwM3W5gUXqGWBz0kobtR6TOBZkpEseS7yO+ieg=; b=eiEvlNWK3AtyRnnjYhI17vXZ99P0utRM/3hIMjwEXRoHZ7HsgSht+9f6JNZ9E3fEU+ 9cJTv8DCSOfk9wsUDklnoO3ZLHTeGSn67famBX2x1J2J+Vw4OVMoqWfEMGPb6LIE0iQK bA/d4s8Zqt/IPj8fz758h4mop7jXB3SZSwIkZ7KJB0A/Gx4go0ofki3cnWdBf4gujcDn 1pL9+JBDFKBF6q6yhgA394JsKSlY07RndmBZoxNFyVBuKPUNMJZe2wwKZbnBD3Ew2TO2 zoyr/pW/OfRbQZBN/Wqt8x72QjdN8uIzP6NaDXzhdaTPHsGhEXf3DfYmyLvbRWYXgemy PPng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2X+GPLwM3W5gUXqGWBz0kobtR6TOBZkpEseS7yO+ieg=; b=Vxz5YajXICJJxW25urKX97rMDwkSU28I8wwhr0Iq4a+SLWPkPgEVpegcH537Ke4tNa 3j+CcAMHfWoHcJ4qga6MisDzPe9xXoopgt+tHeB6cirkDACcWVZtmquvTL0FCokeQ1BW WiiqrWkU6uQLO1L4CYk9F51AoUNiaAlLb+7rFlJa8MF7q+EdJ8ASMPkSx3WH+6AFtVBi UiL4nd/L1eW1yvt6KoukBnNCE2w1mfvaegjkIwdDvalt8W3DslWgKZVUqhvlpX4kMKqQ tudvYZB+76+geJLtcPD3RCdw71Nh+nEu/07E0qDIX/f+SP1gO+hJ2PQIhbqcRdPXUtgV oz/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HYvhBIIu16gc58S+U+C6y1/+hpVmW5iFRN2mPMxroCNWqAj/Y Zd9egXQd4lTW+G6aYwPnaWdd010ee/TzlN+8mRw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzne7cx2zeBFGpT/wfWPYIgUNds8ncK6On3GyX8BI/sMMxK1SuJ0YGJExu7J4LPEcRHzMFDNGGPYpH6LfRcuPk=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6c01:: with SMTP id a1mr26721321ioh.31.1605902956263; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:09:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+wi2hNY4tAxoAbQNb13z+CNcP8+GPX2eKV_poFLrrr5TudmsQ@mail.gmail.com> <8384F1B4-7AB2-4951-BAEA-3FC02A0ADDBD@tsinghua.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <8384F1B4-7AB2-4951-BAEA-3FC02A0ADDBD@tsinghua.org.cn>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:08:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hPza=KBJHHjQkqLDQKvZ=-D9uSTXEnSqzmb-xXi_eVARQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000407f5805b48f6bb4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/xUwe28U-Ak4Ryl5DD4Q1bgTOUpc>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Prefix Unreachable Announcement Use Cases
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:09:19 -0000

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:27 AM Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
wrote:

> Hi, Tony:
>
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
>
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 17:45, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Yes, acknowledging the idea of negative disaggregation is inspired by RIFT
> work is fine (and normally, when inspired by an idea at least in research
> cycles it is considered basic courtesy to refer to the according source,
> something has been lost more and more in IETF over time I dare to observe
> which in itself reflects on the community IMO) but please do not try to
> compare the two beyond that.
>
> [WAJ] PUA has no relation with RIFT. I have not yet study what’s problem
> it encountered, but welcome the experts have such design experience to
> point out the pitfall that PUA can bypass.
>
>
aha, ok, I just chimed in because I saw people somehow implying a map of
RIFT negative disaggregation in relation to this work but if this is a
completely different mechanism than I just watch from the sidelines

thanks

-- tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email