IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Sun, 02 December 2018 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED58130EDC for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 05:18:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7O3k5vrS7qnR for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 05:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E63130EC9 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 05:18:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=895; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1543756693; x=1544966293; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JupAi+wB3NLOEHgkldvJoGYF/V6W1HuHzJathoZq+4Y=; b=XsUGnzvMphal5WvDKr1YWRMG3UnlbrtHBUSAqCuPztBGp8ouKGFa81tG Q2kBz/MainaKepLUcw+B6hPZ2aVp+XxNwv9BuEAX3HVZFwYiphQXAV+Qy 8/E1oNNiLtfZWjk3v7t2j3EI7q1AatwFL8T1bp1bcIsh6CTvfHjO5DrVv M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,306,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="8529422"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Dec 2018 13:18:11 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.54] (ams-ppsenak-nitro5.cisco.com [10.60.140.54]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wB2DIBA1030628; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 13:18:11 GMT
Message-ID: <5C03DB95.1080209@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:18:13 +0100
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <4221EF3E-E369-469D-AAAC-F8DDE24E981E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4221EF3E-E369-469D-AAAC-F8DDE24E981E@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.54, ams-ppsenak-nitro5.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/xgWK9d7u_RPIW5mktmyfBcqxSkE>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 13:18:16 -0000

Support.

Peter

On 02/12/18 01:54 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> This begins a two-week WG adoption call for the subject draft. As anyone
> who has been following the topic knows, there are a lot of proposal in
> this space. However, as WG co-chair, I believe this simple IS-IS
> extension doesn’t really conflict with any of the other more disruptive
> flooding proposals. Also, it is more mature and there is some
> implementation momentum. Note that I’m making every attempt to be
> transparent and it is perfectly ok to disagree with me. Please post your
> comments to this list before 12:00 AM, December 16^th , 2018.
>
> With respect to the more disruptive proposals, we are discussing our
> next steps.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email