Re: [Lsr] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05

[Padmadevi Pillay Esnault <[e-mail]>]

Yingzhen

Thank you for your comment.
Will respin the draft to address them.

Padma

From: Lsr <[e-mail]> on behalf of Yingzhen Qu <[e-mail]>
Date: Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 3:17 PM
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Lsr] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05

Dear authors,

I’m assigned to do the shepherd review for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05.

The following question needs to be answered in the review:

(16) Will publication of this document change the status of any existing
     RFCs?  Are those RFCs listed on the title page header, listed in
     the abstract, and discussed in the introduction? If the RFCs are
     not listed in the Abstract and Introduction, explain why, and point
     to the part of the document where the relationship of this document
     to the other RFCs is discussed. If this information is not in the
     document, explain why the WG considers it unnecessary.

draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05 does change RFC 2328, and this needs to be added in the title pager header, the abstract, and introduction. So please do an update version of the draft to include the required changes.

Also, please fix the nits in the abstract: “however it will not used as a transit router.”.

Thanks,
Yingzhen