Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

"Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com> Sun, 02 December 2018 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <naikumar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C709130DBE for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 15:22:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.96
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lx1mNI6jVUPi for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 15:22:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26ABD130DCD for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 15:22:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1582; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1543792959; x=1545002559; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=CtQpHqMNj9ZJH72gC9ZKtzy0iEP6Ut357fJPPYoOeHk=; b=ScJMCp/NmTuXEbsbo5B5dDYf2t4or5jYlnK54mODOkHp1+eG/LcCw1TY rVtRFjqMLw+sLMbHWNJH1sJZOiuKgLd06lYw4doyLcqgbjHIxMHBmLGlZ wcnJB7jUI+ShzamwvC1RPXpLfAOUcXTgJYXr8DpZ3z2IgsNUU4jcZc7MM Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAAD+ZwRc/4cNJK1kGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBggNmgQIUEwqDb4gYjAmBaCWXSIF6CwEBGAuESQIXgx0iNAkNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFPQEBAQMBARsGEToLEAIBCBgCAh8HAgICJQsVEAIEDgWDIQGCAQ+iFYEvihkFgQuLEReBf4EQKAwTgkyDHgEBgWGDBDGCJgKVXopiCQKROhiBW4URijqCe5VLAhEUgScfOCeBLnAVOyoBgkGCUIhMhT9BMYx9gR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,308,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="480148137"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Dec 2018 23:22:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (xch-aln-011.cisco.com [173.36.7.21]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wB2NMcw9016591 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 23:22:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:22:38 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:22:38 -0600
From: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07
Thread-Index: AQHUidmVWciJv+aKoUynGflpCsnMjqVsXcUA///LHoA=
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 23:22:38 +0000
Message-ID: <BEF1EE3C-1560-4219-A3C0-824814D0001A@cisco.com>
References: <4221EF3E-E369-469D-AAAC-F8DDE24E981E@cisco.com> <CAK-sB7Hw5EZFK5v-Gy5tk9WCQkQ2N=0b7+PW=Be3cANGez+Whw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK-sB7Hw5EZFK5v-Gy5tk9WCQkQ2N=0b7+PW=Be3cANGez+Whw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.a.0.180210
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.20.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0C21D0E19975C94AB29C25C1B8B6481C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.21, xch-aln-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ykgVuYVzGhlvAOsReoi6U7vh4h4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 23:22:42 -0000

Hi,

Support.

Regards,
Nagendra

    On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 7:55 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
    >
    > This begins a two-week WG adoption call for the subject draft. As anyone who has been following the topic knows, there are a lot of proposal in this space. However, as WG co-chair, I believe this simple IS-IS extension doesn’t really conflict with any of the other more disruptive flooding proposals. Also, it is more mature and there is some implementation momentum. Note that I’m making every attempt to be transparent and it is perfectly ok to disagree with me. Please post your comments to this list before 12:00 AM, December 16th, 2018.
    >
    >
    >
    > With respect to the more disruptive proposals, we are discussing our next steps.
    >
    >
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Acee
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Lsr mailing list
    > Lsr@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
    
    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    Lsr@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr