IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 03 December 2018 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C3812D4EB; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 07:31:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5p31tBu91vi; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 07:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60738128766; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 07:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 200116b82ceada00d118188815e95600.dip.versatel-1u1.de ([2001:16b8:2cea:da00:d118:1888:15e9:5600]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1gTqBs-0000Kl-GZ; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:31:20 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <5C054541.8000409@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:31:19 +0100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, lsr@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <96C60EDC-ECD5-4385-8A3D-7AC624AA11C3@kuehlewind.net>
References: <154384812235.18300.11710871832133431074.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5C054541.8000409@cisco.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1543851084;c4cee31f;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1gTqBs-0000Kl-GZ
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/zj45PumX0ZxSMM61uFF9kM5TABg>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:31:26 -0000


> Am 03.12.2018 um 16:01 schrieb Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>:
> 
>> Minor comments:
>> 1) In intro: "...while an adjacency segment, in
>>    most cases, is a one-hop path."
>> Is that true, that in _most_ cases it is one hop?
> 
> the text is referring to adjacency segment, which is local and only programmed on the node where the adjacency exists and its path is representing the path to the adjacent neighbor. This is contrary to prefix segment, which is global and programmed on all routers, so can represent a multi-hop path.

Ah, wasn’t really aware that adjacency segment is a well-defined term here. 

Thanks!
Mirja

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email