Re: [Lsvr] [Idr] Issue 2: Auto-configuration Requirements - draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery-requirements

Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com> Mon, 10 June 2019 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8B312006E; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bwfWBwnLAD2F; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B0FB120025; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id go2so4186849plb.9; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lpaZThYJzBRCMLJyqHoXBK4aJVPzfMKYM/LM9ABiZjI=; b=WpzdQvIy9Um9tDpMRckrKRmzgTwXMAITdEZF3kcX1oLUtJfcuunmHqTQ+4VxdiERwU 3ffaVWpQihDW+uDk2785euRw2xYm1uo00MAslHHIVEZCK+7JTc+v8afJL9s5SCHKzGHW 5gVtZ2wkM9XLKtBjz/RFXy7jToX93t3QCVZfGYYTDtF/VALxlIT2NB1UAd1enLEeI++G C9rjylnnsWEpL3eISo/z4QQBxnMrnSVQMIAcI1RtNyx4FeSo5NrowMqqrcsOQJLT8G9x 1V+0N1flt5TBMQw566eFXp92ZoBqnrizwtpSU+0zCrXS77HoeayeqT0EQHl2Ktpq9DsD Fj1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lpaZThYJzBRCMLJyqHoXBK4aJVPzfMKYM/LM9ABiZjI=; b=WJIqdiafZJ+c+Mcqr1x+UEndkbzfjGUAg2kjUX/atWR5FS2AZ51CglLJshYTWSetcJ 7msmKhpRK/tbkwI1caqwaFkeiMrGK9SWDFSGseuL3PTtp4X6FAe4vcOPnsE0yj5wdmO2 hON4C0Eyf9bc5CZJ2XYkSVfRS4flIV/CENzzC2LVwXZ3OeqbNaIIXVQS12Yy9mwvO73v 1doxERAtk+0xqV+Dhqgl8QBFmRzbEhw0Z5imvQUpE0EN5JVbMzUeOcCG0dMJudIzrfyg csoNqcqnIvX8XQPVLLBkRqHw5ChDeWZgOpcUKzYCYUC8Xb8JJeike9JT/fbYaRmLyXyv xUKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWGrIfo+5ZyQBIePBBJb0MVaNWTqDw3/vvac6F68DKuk587aqSa 1i0Lk9zvr4Ov/mOx0Nk1vOrfJybw0OK7KgqWabg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQPA4cZHAQ595kPd6PMxFvD1hyfimlU28dnS4ZqtnC1HoHTiZUcd/nFwTFFS0lWzYWUzH7v/HiOeldh1IALCc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7897:: with SMTP id q23mr71920070pll.21.1560205532622; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <020201d51fc2$e8b748e0$ba25daa0$@ndzh.com> <m2lfy9p3sf.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2lfy9p3sf.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:25:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmihrngOHJJ7K_+xDJtZo0eLPJBGjSjj4N4bmP7KFzLtg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, lsvr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008c7732058affa816"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/-Ff3I1b_9gjNTovG6kq3vzRVzxA>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] [Idr] Issue 2: Auto-configuration Requirements - draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery-requirements
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 22:25:36 -0000

> are discovery of addresses available on links, not bgp specific at all

And this is *the approach* that should be endorsed !

BGP is opaque to all of this. It just by mistake happens to be overused
today also here, but this will be fixed with time.

r.





On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:46 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery requirements:
>
> note that this is bgp discovery
>
> the lsvr work in
>
>   draft-ymbk-lsvr-discovery-req
>   draft-ietf-lsvr-l3dl-00
>
> are discovery of addresses available on links, not bgp specific at all
>
> and
>
>   draft-ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-ulpc
>
> extends l3dl to send the *minimal* information on a link which can be
> used to bring up a bgp[-spf] session, leaving the details for, and
> trying not to conflict with, BGP OPEN
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsvr mailing list
> Lsvr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr
>