IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsvr] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (to end 17 December 2018)

Jacob Uecker <juecker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 11 December 2018 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <juecker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4401277CC; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:42:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vve2q24UggmN; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37CC11277C8; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id d72so6656511pga.9; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:42:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+NuvUAc4vKcg6TM5YyHJBDwIXuTuQTmOcN20eXZGZCY=; b=q4zE5JgfNFf/lgHWj7OICdqYAJs/sOTDilEkYMe9z+Fth6g+Sfe8NRsZ8v7V+5Dmux sShW4vI4V3EWCLGhd2pizidlX7Ak/HcgPYsNT3FGADoAR9BAs9c6f+hMKqFEKKqqMbfn q+1tJzk6/1IlC3JJ13nqVTqeuVyCvnGXlVUB+xNvtrYnz/KraRz5qrtqVTtwKh4Bjk2J 7MnUlaNIVwkK8JgaVvgkTs/3K9HYOtP7XkatONzdNZhgK17EUtC7YDppVbnuywx8af57 Mlhay8vbqUfhPmgGcbg/BWH5aCxAfzSqe6C/XQ+qV0HfG63X2+/5qtJISDXMa+VX+VlE Txaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+NuvUAc4vKcg6TM5YyHJBDwIXuTuQTmOcN20eXZGZCY=; b=UkcVCtGfbDFBXxAz8v5UxKYq6PCTUMoOZesbu18OBopHWGW9o745iOIlpzV0sE1WLc PArzCwiRDqbokr9ddpJYkxaH1ewwAO3xjpzaW7EFj0X7MvRFcNW3wyltPakeMiJ5Z7J6 llZbbJV3vJKsDHcDkwjibjDHLCOyTGJL+6T/h3yNZrHpEPTDF4Avz3YC1+IuVTERb7C0 p3yVg26t3WVpR03dnq8rSjYHsAdrgpX83B0tD6BmqN9xCbHic5Ge0Zpl06FH8w8viqMs WHZQFZMMTBrkFY0aaeF/xO0p+Oc48diqNVuqw5BQdV3BbIqlyCwWtG0Zdv3FTY+co+xP PkrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZSalO9nUgg8+mlXliT9TNCOB/yggYQxDozjuwZtZfPGiwULFOa SDdhLtbUbmt8mIoF/wlEptI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/U9/x3TnRVrh1oh0WdtkYqHGAkEzANPw/8L8rxIqvVSXG+Yc70VGvfkE9FTR6Ven6gACMKOUw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:31c1:: with SMTP id x184mr16907325pfx.204.1544535727782; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8801:880:5f7:81fe:8168:d32d:dad0? ([2600:8801:880:5f7:81fe:8168:d32d:dad0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m67sm21280433pfb.25.2018.12.11.05.42.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\))
From: Jacob Uecker <juecker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB5137489883B42A07A325D735E0AE0@AM0PR07MB5137.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 05:42:05 -0800
Cc: "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, "draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe@ietf.org" <draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe@ietf.org>, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <045572CB-4163-42DC-B88D-3307BEEDD4A4@gmail.com>
References: <AM0PR07MB5137489883B42A07A325D735E0AE0@AM0PR07MB5137.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/TMo9AY2IeMJbnysFEvn-bKYf0z8>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (to end 17 December 2018)
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:42:10 -0000

1) Yes, I support it
2 - 4) No issues, pain points or missing items. As noted, there are some items that could warrant additional discussion and flushing out but nothing that would stop this document form moving forward.

Thank you

Jacob 

> On Dec 3, 2018, at 6:23 AM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
>  
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (December 3 – December 17)
> and is the procedure follow up of the IETF103 LSVR WG meeting where WG adoption was recognized..   
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe/
>  
> During your discussion in the WG Adoption Call, the chairs are looking for more context as only a 'yeh' or 'ney'.
>  
> Please indicate the following things:
> 1) Support to adopt draft " draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03" as LSVR WG document?
> 2) Are there any technical issues with this draft?
> 3) Which are current pain-points in the draft requiring additional content and technical attention?
> 4) What is missing from this draft?
>  
> The authors (or anybody else) of this draft should send their IPR statements in response to this email. 
>  
> Kind Regards,
> Gunter & Victor
> LSVR WG co-chairs
> _______________________________________________
> Lsvr mailing list
> Lsvr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email