Re: [Lsvr] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (to end 17 December 2018)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 10 December 2018 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BCF131145; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:28:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.958
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.958 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnObxn54nhJu; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:28:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13CB5124D68; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:28:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10450; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1544466485; x=1545676085; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=DLzR6TenHIF870W3iZV1yx84WrIMiwc1+XnIPYZPONU=; b=JpXtX0+3fG9c7jN6gJzEEB89mb1ERXu06GY+20AEqkxswUjfl6vXJjIQ ukoJ00D39LSs9WeHsXKtlr8PaAO03pHJ0mOEIP29p1DkNOI8KADNSiOdI omI2EE5f8ASRze7WkFR81o7QovpXDxOTbBcLIMWgVifXnIQPBx2uhWMt2 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZAAA+rw5c/5pdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVAIBAQEBCwGBDXZmgQInCoNwlCiBaCWReIVtgWYLAQEjhEkZgxQiNwYNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFPAEDAx0GVhIBCBEDAQIrAgQwHQoEAQ0FgyEBgR1kD6YygS+EQUCFHAWMIReBf4E4DBOCTIFBgV0CAwGBKgESAT+CZDGCJgKGcogzkVAJAocGhluDbBiBXIUXikqJIoRzinQCERSBJzUiZXFwFWUBgkGCMx2ITIU/QTGKYYEfgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,339,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="409159903"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Dec 2018 18:28:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wBAIS3oB019914 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:28:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:28:03 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:28:03 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe@ietf.org" <draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe@ietf.org>, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Thread-Topic: [Lsvr] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (to end 17 December 2018)
Thread-Index: AQHUkLYWt0+upVUlTcymqqCmzdhZxQ==
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:28:03 +0000
Message-ID: <23D897AA-75BC-4616-8810-1C73AD031C42@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_23D897AA75BC461688101C73AD031C42ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.153, xch-rtp-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/USB1qpa0ZkzSLXaHk42SXw6iR2c>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (to end 17 December 2018)
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:28:07 -0000

I support WG adoption. This is an innovative new protocol that solves a number of dynamic discovery issues.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Lsvr <lsvr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Gunter Van de Velde <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Date: Monday, December 3, 2018 at 9:23 AM
To: "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe@ietf.org" <draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe@ietf.org>, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Subject: [Lsvr] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (to end 17 December 2018)

Hi All,

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (December 3 – December 17)
and is the procedure follow up of the IETF103 LSVR WG meeting where WG adoption was recognized..

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe/

During your discussion in the WG Adoption Call, the chairs are looking for more context as only a 'yeh' or 'ney'.

Please indicate the following things:
1) Support to adopt draft " draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03" as LSVR WG document?
2) Are there any technical issues with this draft?
3) Which are current pain-points in the draft requiring additional content and technical attention?
4) What is missing from this draft?

The authors (or anybody else) of this draft should send their IPR statements in response to this email.

Kind Regards,
Gunter & Victor
LSVR WG co-chairs