Re: [Lsvr] "Shortest Path Routing Extensions for BGP Protocol" - draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-10 Implementation Status
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 03 August 2020 19:20 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199963A1053 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HEJ8MLE997me for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C543A0AF4 for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id y3so35230865wrl.4 for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 12:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=muvQrXJWLI03ceAy+MAqWdUsBkmH654m9FTBbFOEsso=; b=TqVXyFuRHR3bk5x0hDeXfMU3u2re5u6hu1IQ67Le5QRTpIkkpn+GfVJwDoC6sdcqfk 3PfXG4ZAk+XPg03SZrMeoDxauxnmongXLwbH+DyWeth0GJ7WqfQyEm4HCqdwmG+dfj8R IW8Voaa6Lh6cKq2DTvEiHYVUjAiyBL25l0EP2f85cexbPi7fUCatoLNepux6AoEmXPdv jOpghwJsq7vPCUqu3XJunKiOorjIIbHgXxfy/bivQdhK2YtZFzQYLgkqVW+VA1lhZmWd 77lSaNIqMdc0wTnZQBVgLmBfvN+wGjPtyT4obSdLuoX9BlsYHp2tfJwJ+IeaJ9lCEf08 bwWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=muvQrXJWLI03ceAy+MAqWdUsBkmH654m9FTBbFOEsso=; b=T/5yQEQlfSd35PaPuWHnSIHqyYobGXFxeS1tUx4DsF3oa6qKHXen1rEp47RaXtSqaH pUzb86DyCxe8KpfEJFXeapvZl70HvN8ymZnwSxQ50t4YurcaPm+1eJPDJ6FvP7qEFCew 1U23Wn+BDdVhRKi9p0oDnXp+HacrMLalhgLHaqc24UB0nU9SsQXKgRx2yDKeLwT9/X37 AFy6zAXa8e3kAgo1Ls1J5WjqhdYCrhsOtkPMmpQQLBM3JIlHGAlM+NSzSDAZI8dmwXgn I/RVd8ySrcYjiiKexXokuUNscXVBvt7weJAF+eojRisnBy0LIv8fReATEeV/sF2SamR2 NpnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329r3MoHd/Rgt82oWCBktTWW3iqoKwuONNo8NuHlaUzFeE0Z7qM Y7jJYj/lpY/WNgbgNbQ5qsWLy8yLxU056AheQUf6ctKC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJcfmE6IqNqxgVfj7aiXiazw1Do/2zM2dgfvv4/r4AdGu3ruUpXwqLo0KwRpEMRGyDt2KaTBJL5tXoy8hONcY=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:d092:: with SMTP id y18mr15462960wrh.145.1596482429659; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 12:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:20:28 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D351C7C2-C2D1-4CDD-9CAB-F4EFF3BE4DFC@cisco.com>
References: <D351C7C2-C2D1-4CDD-9CAB-F4EFF3BE4DFC@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:20:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMESszdrNAo+iYc2qMuZzLVe1oGG70_4NygQzFHyjAPaeiHKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001c2f8a05abfe088e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/f3tKotXu91tJkGazpA5z4TVom_Y>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] "Shortest Path Routing Extensions for BGP Protocol" - draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-10 Implementation Status
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 19:20:34 -0000
Acee: Hi! I was asking for an rfc7942-style section…but an informative reference to the implementation report draft is ok with me. Note that I don’t think it is necessary to publish the implementation report draft as a RFC. Thanks! Alvaro. On August 3, 2020 at 1:49:43 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) ( acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org) wrote: Hi Alvaro, You had asked about implementation status in the subject draft. Why couldn’t we simply add an informative reference to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psarkar-lsvr-bgp-spf-impl/ ? Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ Lsvr mailing list Lsvr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr
- [Lsvr] "Shortest Path Routing Extensions for BGP … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsvr] "Shortest Path Routing Extensions for … Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Lsvr] "Shortest Path Routing Extensions for … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsvr] "Shortest Path Routing Extensions for … Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Lsvr] "Shortest Path Routing Extensions for … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsvr] "Shortest Path Routing Extensions for … Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)