IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsvr] WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-signing-01 (to end 21 May 2020)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 07 May 2020 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC9F3A0E2A; Thu, 7 May 2020 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nNV6Ffw1cHMR; Thu, 7 May 2020 14:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2D193A0E1B; Thu, 7 May 2020 14:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1jWnvJ-0005Hz-CL; Thu, 07 May 2020 21:19:17 +0000
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 14:19:16 -0700
Message-ID: <m2d07fjve3.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: lsvr@ietf.org, draft-ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-signing@ietf.org, gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com, victor@jvknet.com
In-Reply-To: <AA246C13-7D42-46EF-B2D4-955D4B26F411@vigilsec.com>
References: <AA246C13-7D42-46EF-B2D4-955D4B26F411@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/v2dY0FYd13L183hVJn7vHQ7NRXQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-signing-01 (to end 21 May 2020)
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 21:19:30 -0000

> I believe that the document needs to have a normative reference to RFC
> 5280 for certificate validation.

easy.  and i have a stashed review from you that still needs to be
incorporated.

to be a bit more transparent

  i am sufficiently old skool that i do not move to adopt a document on
  which i am co-author.  it feels tacky.

  and i think adoption is how one gets it into the wg to actually work
  on it, not to rubber stamp what has been discussed for three years in
  the call for adoption.  so i expect this and l3dl-ulpc will both need
  more work once adopted

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email