Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6
"Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> Thu, 16 July 2009 08:03 UTC
Return-Path: <doug@ewellic.org>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC1C3A6B5F for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.838, BAYES_40=-0.185, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VJuZVm77JjsA for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth13.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth13.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A8003A6B42 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17971 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 04:02:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (67.166.27.148) by smtpauth13.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.37) with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2009 04:02:45 -0000
Message-ID: <D02BACE4E1924F1297E380340D715E14@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.14456.1247709311.4936.ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:02:44 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Subject: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:03:06 -0000
John Cowan <cowan at ccil dot org> wrote: > Of the latter class, some can be identified with particular BCP 47 > tags, but the bulk cannot due to the lack of corresponding registered > variants. In addition, there are concepts like "Written X" that have > no BCP 47 equivalent at present; we can represent "X written in script > Y" but not the concept of "X written in any script." It would -- or at least it should -- be a simple matter for ietf-languages to register two variant subtags, 'written' and 'spoken', each with no Prefix, if this is felt to be a genuine need. -- Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 Doug Ewell