Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext-03

[Felix Sasaki <[e-mail]>]

Looks good to me, many thanks.

Felix

2011/7/14 Mark Davis ☕ <[e-mail]>

> Here's what I have in my working copy:
>
>  <t>The t extension is not intended for use in structured data that
> already provides for source and target language identifiers.
>
> For example, this is the case in localization interchange formats such as
> XLIFF.
>
> In such cases, it would be inappropriate to use "ja-t-it" for the target
> language tag because the source language tag
>
> "it" would already be present in the data. Instead one would use the
> language tag "ja".
>
> </t>
>
>
> Mark
> *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 21:54, Felix Sasaki <[e-mail]>wrote:
>
>> The extension defined in this document is not meant to be used for (mostly
>> localization related) formats that already align source and target text in a
>> dedicated, often XML based structure. For example, in an XLIFF file aligning
>> a source like the original writing of Italian cities and a target, i.e. the
>> Japanese transliteration of the cities, using "ja-kana-t-it" for the target
>> would be overgenerating. Instead one would use the language tag "ja-kana".
>>
>
>