IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: matching comments: use of prefixes

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Thu, 29 September 2005 15:04 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EKzxX-0004Gg-Ab; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:04:31 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EKzxW-0004Gb-6M for ltru@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:04:30 -0400
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA17634 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:04:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EKztS-0000dd-76 for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:00:18 +0200
Received: from c-180-160-70.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.180.160.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:00:18 +0200
Received: from nobody by c-180-160-70.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:00:18 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:57:38 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <433C00E2.6B21@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <FA13712B13469646A618BC95F7E1BA8F0E2756@alvmbxw01.prod.quest.cor p> <A7575D6FC2613DBEAAE36EA6@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-180-160-70.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Ltru] Re: matching comments: use of prefixes
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> RFC 1766, and I still remember the debate that got us there.
> What it's trying to prevent is dialogues like this:
 
> Registrant: I register (or use) sgn-GB and sgn-FR
> Searcher: I want something in "sgn".

Now that's immediately clear.  Maybe adding this as example
to Addison's new wording could help.  It would explain that 
matching was already tricky before 3066bis, so that's not a
new "bug" introduced by 3066bis, but just as it is.

                        Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email