IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis and draft-ietf-ltru-matching

Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> Fri, 30 August 2019 04:31 UTC

Return-Path: <florian@rivoal.net>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE85C120C89 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivoal.net header.b=PclQPC0q; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=YMnIy1v/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kzKhKrYpx7I for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96B99120C87 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F4021C1B; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:31:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:31:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivoal.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=o mi7Sk1hRm/9UoEPhdVQYGmUNHDLVX10wMJ4XSlVW+4=; b=PclQPC0qYzreA8Est DhTSElB4tlQXzE5Y98WX/shNrAGPnhcmn2MXkCoN4dbFpz2PG+j4/ZfJ64weZ5uS QFw8znbN6DIbKfcL9R6UGvjzDHt9GXAwlVdvbw6BMOuSqpjgKCYerNSN7ulCItNn ummEg4KJMajzxV4Ha4HE8nNrJjuJA260nA2n0i+bnhzXEMws0lPmcTjYlXFPq7nx EhkwE5X4Eo2MkeRx37XN4bhe36I2jmzAsS7FBSv6nd9OzpmPB9ItRfNAqjiRE4hc 2r0vRlfFE45vSWGiARnSRM2G8STGLBbUh1cWJj9PAsAiKu75vn21CyLEiyv86D1n XtllA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=omi7Sk1hRm/9UoEPhdVQYGmUNHDLVX10wMJ4XSlVW +4=; b=YMnIy1v/88+MBZe6rnE0u/WoYiA68VV4kw/oB3hTG67dxeiZYqhNV9VoB U8nAN0/OOBnAzFx0hlfBgUrkHFUNtuAdkBMRI8z39iHEYZ9r/13S0uzMbnXX1nb7 p4XbK7hLSGB408jIKUJdfE9DtmhG7GiAl2bY65ypmrkM0P7Gb1CF9oMgDibyb8Y9 Zy7V6VYekWO503OQgYvc7ZEPHwbj4Ndkx2IC4INQvke6UZ4Xo27jGYsI3NYwFDu3 I+hml7XgjYnxbSbZSopybRPjw0i4e09cZrMnlUYENtKRUcidrp9dyw5HYCOH6+7H G0rbc1YelR6Fq/VXSd1mgJyf1LmPA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:iqZoXdj5c7eSTQ3YvTkk9ge-KcHY2fGwN1ZSD3pgnQGI2r1TEQ89Jg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudeifedgkedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomhephfhlohhr ihgrnhcutfhivhhorghluceofhhlohhrihgrnhesrhhivhhorghlrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epudekfedrjeeirdehrddvtdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepfhhlohhrihgr nhesrhhivhhorghlrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:iqZoXUF3qh5PDveRTx9xVThw2rHlefO2osTfOJ1H3nGpQPY_8ANGDw> <xmx:iqZoXXJ0EPf9BXbA5x4u1IAxaRB-C5xHBPNTCPhakdTVOtpVyp0CQQ> <xmx:iqZoXc_rYDUuV-OvalVgW9KMMYUpwZ1M0JaI_yfGc3iYcdlMHZ2Aww> <xmx:iqZoXaU4UihxUaIEkjfZ-euwfXS99R-TucRrkO101_U6yNKwPMgH3w>
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (ab005020.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [183.76.5.20]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2CE3280059; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:31:04 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2gp_SywW8Fgpq7e747ses_JhqciwX=tqpqZ2TZ9rM+bfjvkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:31:02 +0900
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <08B7B3B9-F19B-4D4C-AEC6-FD9429BAC192@rivoal.net>
References: <20190827104755.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.0f79efb126.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> <910CB6C8-9F66-4255-B149-B146DA8E5695@rivoal.net> <CAJ2xs_GWQH=zOvzVqUqpFKHmLKWZTR=ybJOv+K_SMhCW==X23g@mail.gmail.com> <73BE5AF7-0C62-425F-834E-8759628D2C5F@rivoal.net> <CAD2gp_S+dDdgo9WsOixT_-jHkWZxmajWmx2MRKi0iDHVSwd-3g@mail.gmail.com> <94B0FC03-B793-43BB-B864-38A306E6B5CA@rivoal.net> <A8BF9658-CB3C-4DC5-AECB-840C0053A943@rivoal.net> <CAD2gp_TJcRiMQYPpV=R7XEd-wZS=UOgQEzCb6t=0iWSBMx2cvQ@mail.gmail.com> <3B2C913C-DE8F-43E2-9819-55DD349EF0BA@rivoal.net> <CAD2gp_SywW8Fgpq7e747ses_JhqciwX=tqpqZ2TZ9rM+bfjvkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ltru/3gQcgfgecFoELrkPHGug3z7Hkdo>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis and draft-ietf-ltru-matching
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ltru/>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 04:31:09 -0000


> On Aug 30, 2019, at 13:06, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
> 
> It was only done for macrolanguages that already had compound tags like zh-yue, plus a few others that seemed likely to be treated similiarly, often because they only a single written form between them.  Aymara is a macrolanguage with two individual languages, Central and Southern, but only Central has a written form and is an official language (of Bolivia).  If you don't care about the diffference, you can use ay, or you can use ayc or ayr to distinguish, but nobody has to worry about abstracting over them.

Not sure I get it.

nb is the preferred form of grandfathered+deprecated no-bok, nn of no-nyn, and no is marked as a macrolanguage. Why do they have not extlang?

—Florian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email