Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?

"Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com> Thu, 09 April 2009 04:15 UTC

Return-Path: <addison@amazon.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06783A6B14 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 21:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.134
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.435, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9tSyIX+13D-s for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 21:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fw-2101.amazon.com (smtp-fw-2101.amazon.com [72.21.196.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FFB28C0EC for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 21:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,158,1238976000"; d="scan'208";a="250641350"
Received: from smtp-in-1104.vdc.amazon.com ([10.140.10.25]) by smtp-border-fw-out-2101.iad2.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Apr 2009 04:16:57 +0000
Received: from ex-hub-4102.ant.amazon.com (ex-hub-4102.ant.amazon.com [10.248.163.23]) by smtp-in-1104.vdc.amazon.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n394Gtlr002613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:16:57 GMT
Received: from EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com ([10.248.163.27]) by ex-hub-4102.ant.amazon.com ([10.248.163.23]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 21:16:55 -0700
From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>
To: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:16:52 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?
Thread-Index: Acm4yVL8YEyQBxkmQ/mP40wkzV54rAAADogg
Message-ID: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA019F40ED88@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
References: <011e01c9b8a3$58ab9670$0a02c350$@net> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA019F40EC70@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <49DD7570.1090002@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <49DD7570.1090002@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: 'IETF Languages Discussion' <ietf-languages@iana.org>, 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] How to handle macrolanguage when no code?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:15:56 -0000

> 
> On 2009/04/09 9:53, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> > HTML certainly allows you to declare that some content is
> applicable to more than one language audience. See:
> 
> Read "HTTP" for "HTML" here. HTML allows you to declare that
> different
> parts of a Web page are in different languages, but not that one
> and the
> same (part of a) Web page are in more than one language.
> 

That's correct. Although this also applies to HTML via the <meta> tag.

The 'lang' attribute in HTML (as with the xml:lang attribute in XML) allow only a single language tag to be applied to a specific scope *within* a document. I should point out that the best practice link I pointed to also makes this distinction: you can declare the "target audience" in one way and the "document processing language" separately in another.

Addison