IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Thu, 25 June 2009 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6C93A690C for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.260, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OuXOA1ggdUuN for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B4E3A6825 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=i797jrvivi3ZqHP2b0Zzim8lyBep5PRwSWX5nzCiSb1nXiy1ZeyhuNcSIB8Gbg4o; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [99.41.52.113] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1MJxoC-00046G-TS for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:52:45 -0400
Message-ID: <011f01c9f5e7$c4085260$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: ltru@ietf.org
References: <BLU109-W233AF30EBDADC34BE1E5B3B3370@phx.gbl><4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AAA08A5E@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <30b660a20906241739t664fd602pdad4aae40e6b476d@mail.gmail.com> <BLU109-W139C0E977E9BA0231F777CB3340@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:53:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d88884f945684cbf69683afecaf79e3427e53795071529fdaf62350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 99.41.52.113
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:15:55 -0000

Hi -

> From: "CE Whitehead" <cewcathar@hotmail.com>
> To: <ltru@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646
...
> But I am confused totally about the 'applicability statement' anyway as I did not
> find it in the draft.

It was added via the RFC editor note in the IESG "protocol action"
announcement.  All that is left before publication is "AUTH48" -
that's the 48-hour (but sometimes much longer) period during which
the editors verify that the RFC editor didn't inadvertantly break
something during the editing process.

>  It's finished?

As far as the WG is concerned, yes.  We're just waiting for the
publication wheels to turn.  Sometimes they move slowly, sometimes
they move with astonishing speed.  In this particular case, I'm not aware
of anything that would slow down publication, but I know better than to
guess when it will actually be published.

>  No further discussion?

There's not much point in it.  In a separate thread, we'll take up the
question of whether the WG should re-charter.

Randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email