Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org> Wed, 16 April 2008 15:58 UTC
Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9751828C255; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38763A6C92 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.276
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KN3q+oqDPVxc for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D01528C255 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 2so1255905ywt.49 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=zdarWrWjRMAs21/iv7moyui8LJXtB7UqnosNqNXf8rc=; b=m8fs9OFyquGinM9QlTPae1Q21UHCBbwX4i9MKtgSZllAvaiBQvXwEBP1U8eS9rKYXF0wfCinnnskxu7/tItGHCTMeRFjJSG0aq+dlgFEGDt49NPQly2m7Fsu2FWF7nx4QnKQNuK1xCEojHHvW2AMJkkZG4YXFxxLCRLm644O4AA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=flOM4KCw3xqq3ViDL1gnhXisAc3XTx8SOCF/hHrLjVDP6KqMHY1RmyBa3WS442cOWjKPckkS7zuFRbzCG0H7bwpDzQKUIMaQQre6gmp8ZkwJN8pMCd4bZVroPqWhw6nd4o1IKcmmUFFfMfAvRr3i9VHibhvwnpM1mbWjUCuyacM=
Received: by 10.150.150.3 with SMTP id x3mr319284ybd.93.1208361514430; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.229.9 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <30b660a20804160858k29f835a9w2a90d0ed399fe791@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:34 -0700
From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01200D8D49@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <48037FF9.9030103@gmx.de> <48049274.3090501@gmx.de> <6.0.0.20.2.20080416155918.08629ec0@localhost> <30b660a20804160646n14a12f71r589d1728c72db695@mail.gmail.com> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01200D8D49@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aaea4d4c20bb8047
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1516569977=="
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
That works for me. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Phillips, Addison <addison@amazon.com> wrote: > Mark wrote: > > -- > > In summary, a language tag is composed of one or more parts: typically a > primary language subtag followed optionally by a series of other subtags > such as script and region. > > -- > > I think that is either too specific or not specific enough J > > > > Perhaps: > > > > In summary, a language tag is composed of one or more subtags separated by > hyphens. Typically there will be a primary language subtag to which other > subtags are sometimes appended to indicate linguistic variations such as > script or region. > > > > Addison Phillips > > Globalization Architect -- Lab126 (Amazon) > > Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG > > > > Internationalization is not a feature. > > It is an architecture. > > > > *From:* ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of > *Mark Davis > *Sent:* mercredi 16 avril 2008 06:46 > *To:* Martin Duerst > *Cc:* Julian Reschke; LTRU Working Group; HTTP Working Group > *Subject:* Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) > > > > Agreed. Even that is incorrect, since there may not be a primary language > subtag, such as in the case of "x-duerst". So I'd recommend something more > like: > > > In summary, a language tag is composed of one or more parts: A > > primary language tag and a possibly empty series of subtags: > => > In summary, a language tag is composed of one or more parts: typically a > primary language subtag followed optionally by a series of other subtags > such as script and region. > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> > wrote: > > At 20:33 08/04/15, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > >OK, > > > >thanks for all the feedback so far. I (hopefully) have addressed many of > the issues; here's the new proposed text for 3.5: > > > >------ > >3.5. Language Tags > > > > A language tag, as defined in [RFC4646], identifies a natural > > language spoken, written, or otherwise conveyed by human beings for > > communication of information to other human beings. Computer > > languages are explicitly excluded. HTTP uses language tags within > > the Accept-Language and Content-Language fields. > > > > In summary, a language tag is composed of one or more parts: A > > primary language tag and a possibly empty series of subtags: > > > > language-tag = <Language-Tag, defined in [RFC4646], Section 2.1> > > > > White space is not allowed within the tag and all tags are case- > > insensitive. The name space of language subtags is administered by > > the IANA (see > > <http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry>). > > This is going very much in the right direction, but there > is some confusion about what a subtag means. Where it says > "A primary language tag and a possibly empty series of subtags", > the first tag (e.g. 'en' in 'en-US') seems to not be a subtag, > but the subtag registry clearly also includes that as a subtag, > and RFC 4646 is using terminology consistent with that. > > Regards, Martin. > > > > Example tags include: > > > > en, en-US, es-419, az-Arab, x-pig-latin, man-Nkoo-GN > > > > See RFC 4646 for further information. > >------ > > > >(see also <http://www.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/13>). > > > > > >BR, Julian > > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp > > _______________________________________________ > > Ltru mailing list > Ltru@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru > > > > > -- > Mark > -- Mark
_______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Phillips, Addison
- [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-L… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Acce… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Acce… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Acce… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Acce… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Acce… Julian Reschke
- [Ltru] Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 … Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (lang… Julian Reschke
- [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag ma… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language ta… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language ta… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language ta… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language ta… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language ta… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language ta… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language ta… Julian Reschke