IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Tue, 09 October 2007 01:11 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1If3d1-0004DX-N9; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:11:19 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1If3cz-0004Bv-CD for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:11:17 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1If3cz-00044y-1j for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:11:17 -0400
Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1If3cn-0002gb-Kl for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:11:12 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=eqYYoFAvHMnd54n9ztAvTkXp2JUUjR/DDBTph4hBezpzvd6s9YSKQAaTdhDlKBME; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [68.166.189.8] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1If3cX-0000BB-Ra for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:10:50 -0400
Message-ID: <000d01c80a11$cef5dbc0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <E1IdpbE-0001z9-9C@megatron.ietf.org> <009b01c80a0f$7035f270$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:14:57 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888a4beb055f130b31a7d43008440b46da657ed016dca5a8be0350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 68.166.189.8
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Hi -

As co-chair...

> From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@roadrunner.com>
> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:57 PM
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags
>
> Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote:
> 
> > At this moment, the discussion seems to favor (1)
> 
> Hard to say.  I think at this moment there are more contributors who 
> favor (1) than (2), but the two main proponents of (2) are the 
> co-editors of 4646bis, which does tip the balance a bit.
...

No, it does not.  Editors do the bidding of the WG, see
RFC 2418 clause 6.3.  As such they are *not* given special
consideration in the determination of working group consensus.

Randy
ltru co-chair





_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email