IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage usage

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Mon, 26 May 2008 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955983A6B08; Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FBD3A6B12 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVGB3SroD8NW for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D6B3A680D for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.96) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:47 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.44]) by tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.88.96]) with mapi; Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:47 -0700
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:44 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Macrolanguage usage
Thread-Index: Aci+yNMu92eEQtsTRtS6EQnkC6NPnwAAvuyw
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E2A40FFF@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <mailman.2658.1211631529.13675.ltru@ietf.org> <001b01c8bdc8$e2d66770$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <483955E8.1070603@malform.no> <004501c8beb2$6f343e10$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <483A0679.2010708@malform.no>
In-Reply-To: <483A0679.2010708@malform.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage usage
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Leif Halvard Silli


> Whether we got 'nn' and 'nb' then or had "suddenly" gotten 'nob'
> and 'nno' today was still not my point. The point was that a
> macrolanguage tagging method would in fact be simpler for users to
> understand.

Well, that's an interesting claim. I've got people (not on this list) claiming the opposite.


Peter
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email