Re: [Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem

The comment below seems to say that changes due to UTF-8 will
be all over the place. That should not be the case. Even if
they are, it's easy in a consolidated diff to identify what
has changed due to UTF-8.

I'd propose that the editors look over the draft, and send
some proposed text for changes to the list, but that we don't
burn another integer (because at the moment, the furnace is closed :-).

Regards,    Martin.

At 08:30 07/07/12, John Cowan wrote:
>Addison Phillips scripsit:
>
>> Then I will incorporate the various pending bits of text plus the 
>> necessary changes for UTF-8 into a new prototype draft, 
>
>Since UTF-8 is controversial and the other bits are (AFAIK) not,
>please make a separate all-pre-UTF-8 fixes draft.  I know this
>uses up another positive integer as a draft number, but we have
>lots of those.
>
>That way we can focus on just what diffs constitute the UTF-8 change.
>
>
>-- 
>A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: cowan@ccil.org]
>Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
>    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>    If it only had metre
>And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ltru mailing list
>Ltru@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru