[Ltru] Re: UTF-8

Doug Ewell wrote:

> Both the current Registry and the prototype 4646bis version
> are in NFC.  Frankly, it hadn't occurred to me to do it any
> other way.

The other possibility is to say whatever the sources say.  I
didn't note that you modified the source descriptions in some
way.  Please don't do this without a rule for it in 4646bis.

> I suppose either 4646bis or 4645bis should state explicitly
> that the Registry is in NFC.

If that's the case they should most definitely say so.  But I
don't see the point, just copy what the sources say as long as
it's an assigned code-point for a character.

> 1 instance of a character not in MES-1 (U+02BB, the "smart"
> apostrophe/modifier letter added to Ge'ez).  It is in MES-2.

Good that we didn't introduce an MES-1 restriction for 4646 :-)

Frank

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru