[Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sat, 08 December 2007 22:37 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J18IJ-0007Su-GW; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:37:11 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J18II-0007NK-NW for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:37:10 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J18II-0007Kc-Cj for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:37:10 -0500
Received: from bortzmeyer.netaktiv.com ([80.67.170.53] helo=mail.bortzmeyer.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J18IH-00085E-Tg for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:37:10 -0500
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 96A0C240824; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 22:36:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 675C51114B; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 23:34:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 23:34:58 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20071208223458.GA26660@sources.org>
References: <20071207213756.GC3346@mercury.ccil.org> <fjel72$d7k$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fjel72$d7k$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: ltru@lists.ietf.org
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 06:47:13PM +0100, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote a message of 145 lines which said: > | from > | "http://www.iana.org/assignments/lang-subtags-templates/". > > What next, tell their Web master what software they have > to use, or how to run backups ? You have some interesting points but this one, I cannot understand. Do you mean we should *not* mandate a given URI? If so, I strongly disagree, we need a stable URI and the best way to have it is to write it down clearly in the RFC (of course, the IANA is welcome to tell us that http://www.iana.org/assignments/templates/lang-subtags/ would be better, if they prefer, but the important point is that it should be written down and not modified afterwards). This has nothing to do with the HTTP server they use because URI are seen externally so they are important for users of the RFC (unlike the backup policy, where only the result matters). _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App.… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Montenegrin what-if Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … John Cowan