Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt

Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@comhem.se> Wed, 16 December 2009 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <kent.karlsson14@comhem.se>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6118E3A69AA for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:39:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rxHF0Ya-zghe for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F73E3A699E for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c83-248-179-85.bredband.comhem.se ([83.248.179.85]:32992 helo=[192.168.1.2]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <kent.karlsson14@comhem.se>) id 1NKqL1-0004i5-7C; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:38:33 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:38:24 +0100
From: Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@comhem.se>
To: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>, Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C74E6920.125D8%kent.karlsson14@comhem.se>
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHKfhs6Z3Na2FbcAkqDFVzdUSyl55FnX3nwgAALVik=
In-Reply-To: <BF2262AF099A70419F68A17FF6338DF40443A0F1@TK5EX14MBXC141.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: 83.248.179.85
X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1NKqL1-0004i5-7C.
X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1NKqL1-0004i5-7C ac5b2ddc4885e52d969840d426291b82
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:39:41 -0000

I don't know who you are referring to... But I know of a book partly on the
subject of using Hangul as a phonetic alphabet (OPA, Othophonic alphabet):

The Korean alphabet of 1446 ­ Expositions, OPA, The visible speech sounds,
Annotated translation, Future applicability; Sek Yen Kim-Cho, Humanity Books
and AC Press, New York, 2002, ISBN 89-428-1587-1.

http://www.amazon.com/Korean-Alphabet-1446-Expositions-Applicability/dp/1591
02000X

    /kent k


Den 2009-12-16 09.59, skrev "Peter Constable" <petercon@microsoft.com>om>:

> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy
> Presuhn
> 
>> (FWIW, I don't see why a pronouncing alphavet would *necessarily* be a
>> romanization system.)
> 
> Indeed: I met a Korean linguist about 10 years ago who was promoting use of
> Hangul for general phonetic transcription.
> 
> 
> 
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru