Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)

"Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com> Mon, 20 July 2009 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <addison@amazon.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02B53A688A for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LU5pX6lOhMnh for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fw-9101.amazon.com (smtp-fw-9101.amazon.com [207.171.184.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0E63A68DE for <ltru@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,236,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="245762705"
Received: from smtp-in-1105.vdc.amazon.com ([10.140.9.24]) by smtp-border-fw-out-9101.sea19.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Jul 2009 18:48:51 +0000
Received: from ex-hub-4104.ant.amazon.com (ex-hub-4104.sea5.amazon.com [10.248.163.25]) by smtp-in-1105.vdc.amazon.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6KImonl020172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:48:50 GMT
Received: from EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com ([10.248.163.30]) by ex-hub-4104.ant.amazon.com ([10.248.163.25]) with mapi; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:48:50 -0700
From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:48:45 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)
Thread-Index: AcoJaX9YiTh1bGDPS5SDcJG8zYg9NgAAMHOQ
Message-ID: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AB99E276@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
References: <mailman.110.1248029268.4909.ltru@ietf.org><8BA7C9A96AE849AE97FA9E1779A81D20@DGBP7M81><30b660a20907191229h282c0673yae2a710c7a7a1248@mail.gmail.com> <8D97027965E89F488BC87B919382D9FD053DF0F2@ussdixms01.am.sony.com> <001d01ca0967$246d3a20$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
In-Reply-To: <001d01ca0967$246d3a20$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:49:05 -0000

> >
> > Hmm. It appears that informative text that I requested previously
> to indicate
> > that script tags should not be used with spoken content was
> removed?
> ...
> 
> Shouldn't have been - I recall we had good agreement on this point.
> 

And indeed the text in question is present. See, for example, in Section 4.1 (Choice) on Page 55:

--
Script subtags are never appropriate for unwritten content (such as audio
recordings).
--

And then at the top of page 56:

--
*  When labeling content that is unwritten (such as a recording
          of human speech), the script subtag should not be used, even
          if the language is customarily written in several scripts.
          Thus the subtitles to a movie might use the tag "uz-Arab"
          (Uzbek, Arabic script), but the audio track for the same
          language would be tagged simply "uz".  (The tag "uz-Zxxx"
          could also be used where content is not written, as the subtag
          'Zxxx' represents the "Code for unwritten documents".)
--

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.