Re: [Ltru] Charter Discussion

"Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net> Thu, 22 June 2006 17:25 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtSwF-0004Db-IQ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:25:55 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtSwF-0004DS-37 for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:25:55 -0400
Received: from mta13.mail.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.44] helo=mta13.adelphia.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtSwD-00025t-Pc for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:25:55 -0400
Received: from DGBP7M81 ([69.162.95.23]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060622172546.HWCQ13077.mta13.adelphia.net@DGBP7M81> for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:25:46 -0400
Message-ID: <005201c69620$e4384290$040aa8c0@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <E1FtLGW-00076l-V6@megatron.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Charter Discussion
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:25:42 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:

> ... We already have a registry in place, one that has a fairly-well 
> defined conceptual model (in spite of current debate over certain 
> details) and also established processes for maintenance and 
> administration -- processes with respect to which we have limitations 
> in our flexibility to change.

I think the "current debate over certain details" is a sign that it 
might be worthwhile to define the conceptual model more clearly.  There 
is a significant disparity between list members' views of the purpose of 
the Description field: is it a cross-reference to ISO standards, a 
string that uniquely identifies the language (script, etc.), an English 
translation, a language-dependent transliteration, or a prescriptive 
spelling with "recommended" letters and punctuation?

At the very least, even if we decide not to adopt ISO 11179 principles, 
we should answer this particular question more definitively.

> Now, I'm sure that if we studied ISO 11179 we would gain a better 
> understanding of the nature of our endeavour and that we would find 
> ways to improve upon what we have. But, I cannot say whether the 
> cost/benefit ratio would be on the benefit side. The most I can say is 
> that I have not seen reasons to set an expectation of greater benefit 
> than cost.

All that is being suggested is that we not reject this effort a priori. 
A few people who are well-versed in the standard can explain its 
principles to others, and a reasonably well-informed discussion can 
proceed from there.  It's not necessary for every list member to read 
all 266 pages.  I doubt every LTRU member has read ISO 639, 3166, and 
15924 in their entirety either.

> The relative importance to incorporate ISO 639-3 over implementation 
> of ISO 11179 is, IMO, a couple of orders of magnitude.

Nobody has suggested that we would have to make a choice between 
incorporating 639-3 and implementing 11179.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California, USA
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru