IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

"Broome, Karen" <Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com> Thu, 29 May 2008 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE523A6B66; Thu, 29 May 2008 09:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368C43A6B6C for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2008 09:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l-bsjYmFnZPd for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2008 09:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound5-wa4-R.bigfish.com (outbound-wa4.frontbridge.com [216.32.181.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DDF3A6B06 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 09:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound5-wa4.bigfish.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by outbound5-wa4-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D5812F8EB7; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:19:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail212-wa4-R.bigfish.com (unknown [10.8.14.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound5-wa4.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFADF08075; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:19:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail212-wa4 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail212-wa4-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F8215A07B2; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:19:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-BigFish: VS-67(zz542N1432R98dR7efV1805M1442Jzzzz1033ILz2dh6bh61h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Antispam-Report: OrigIP: 160.33.98.75;Service: EHS
Received: by mail212-wa4 (MessageSwitch) id 121207799690159_18952; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:19:56 +0000 (UCT)
Received: from mail8.fw-bc.sony.com (mail8.fw-bc.sony.com [160.33.98.75]) by mail212-wa4.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8831A280E5; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:19:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail3.sjc.in.sel.sony.com (mail3.sjc.in.sel.sony.com [43.134.1.211]) by mail8.fw-bc.sony.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4TGJsXI006991; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:19:55 GMT
Received: from ussdixhub21.spe.sony.com ([43.130.141.76]) by mail3.sjc.in.sel.sony.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4TGJsKa004694; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:19:54 GMT
Received: from USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com ([43.130.141.74]) by ussdixhub21.spe.sony.com ([43.130.141.76]) with mapi; Thu, 29 May 2008 09:19:33 -0700
From: "Broome, Karen" <Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com>
To: Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@comhem.se>, "ltru@ietf.org" <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:19:32 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
Thread-Index: AcjBJ+pzUbf8k/5gRcepzRoTLFZE7gAC3iJpAAtGj2AAEbbScA==
Message-ID: <E19FDBD7A3A7F04788F00E90915BD36C13C251B431@USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com>
References: <422633.90603.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <E19FDBD7A3A7F04788F00E90915BD36C13C2528ABB@USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com> <002d01c8c163$1c3186b0$0201a8c0@streamserve.com>
In-Reply-To: <002d01c8c163$1c3186b0$0201a8c0@streamserve.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Yikes, if I implied that, my apologies. I don't want that at all. I don't want any hierarchies that aren't already baked into the ISO standards.

Karen

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kent Karlsson [mailto:kent.karlsson14@comhem.se]
>Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 1:08 AM
>To: Broome, Karen; ltru@ietf.org
>Subject: RE: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
>
>
>Broome, Karen wrote:
>> I thought the primary goal was identification, not fallback.
>> Without extlang, we lose some information the ISO standards
>> otherwise contain.
>
>You seem to be arguing for (in an ideal case) a partial
>language family hierarcy in each tag. Tags like
>
>gem-de (or gem-deu)
>
>or even
>
>und-ine-gem-de-gsw
>
>and the like. Of course that is not possible to introduce, for
>several reasons. I'm just trying to understand your argument.
>As Mark mentioned, the individual language codes do identify
>a language, without explicitly giving any part of the
>hierarchy in the tag.
>
>        /kent k
>


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email