[Ltru] Re: FX is deprecated
"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Sat, 01 December 2007 22:45 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyb5P-00071i-2W; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:45:23 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyb5N-0006yj-V4 for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:45:21 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyb5N-0006pr-Kb for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:45:21 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyb59-0002ZH-5s for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:45:19 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyb4n-0005Vp-CE for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:44:45 +0000
Received: from c-180-160-112.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.180.160.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:44:45 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-180-160-112.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:44:45 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:46:46 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <fiso4m$68c$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <007801c83460$5e6d3820$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-180-160-112.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] Re: FX is deprecated
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Doug Ewell wrote: > Is everyone comfortable with this? Sure, but it won't surprise you that I'm not going to download and check drafts with "fantasy island" codes. FX means one of eight down. UK still missing as the "minimal" subset that must be allowed if anything is, it's the only plausible code (I could do without it). Later in this thread (Stephane and Doug): >> So, even if ISO 3166 resurrects it, we won't? > That's what 4646 and 4646bis say. Then they're broken by design and need to be fixed. Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] FX is deprecated Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: FX is deprecated Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: FX is deprecated Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: FX is deprecated Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] FX is deprecated Peter Constable