Re: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguage and extlang

"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org> Sun, 15 July 2007 23:12 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IADGg-000234-MV; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:12:46 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IADGf-00022s-HF for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:12:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IADGf-00022k-7R for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:12:45 -0400
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IADGa-0007zL-Sf for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:12:45 -0400
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so1664093waf for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=VIx1qycpKJ+5S/+rJs0qeIJ/DbONAZrdFlqGGN4SRviye1DXVWA4wQOcdfg3XVJPlOoZiG9bp4YWic44FWQMqY2s5KEjC73h8FSNoIiJHNLK9NeTpjMohoRRcja1T8qv8UetTmXOx1PhUjzsbV8UvV8yRg/1n40sng5O/wn88bs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Pw6wPhNtijQfGGhGI67vqZCUn5iP4h44GAsqWuzuK67taoEWl/Fvm0I4uvDWLPiR7gnGfpcoY+AdAoX8DpKxnsmEzff0dbFFBqZEkzB4vdDu99i7UOWgGwZu36O8jItdDs9bcpJeSD5Y9qG7TPPFKDx0b752Z1ld6HKXpk1CJp4=
Received: by 10.115.78.1 with SMTP id f1mr3631680wal.1184541160105; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.196.12 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <30b660a20707151612k14b1e578q7cc7887c68ccc785@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:12:40 -0700
From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Macrolanguage and extlang
In-Reply-To: <20070715152301.GY9402@mercury.ccil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E1I9ghp-0006L9-0h@megatron.ietf.org> <013b01c7c6a8$55cb4a20$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <20070715152301.GY9402@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8255a412e6bc9fe2
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc: Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1252789957=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> I do most strenuously object to upsetting the extlang applecart.  Extlangs
> are a sensible and necessary shim between the 639-2-only world of 4646
> and the mixed 639-2/3 world of 4646bis, and I have seen no compelling
> reasons why they should be discarded.  We have been planning them for
> years, and we should stick to our plan unless there is some hard reason
> to change it.


The main argument I've hear for extlang is behind-the-scenes-inertia. While
we made provision in 4646 for possibly accepting them in the future, it was
by no means a done-deal.

The only reason I've heard advocated for them is that it makes matching
easier. But in practice, we have simply not found that to be true. If it is
indeed  worthwhile to add this mechanism to 4646, a good case needs to be
made for it; and inertia isn't a good case.

Mark
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru