Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Tue, 29 August 2006 20:41 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIAOX-0001uR-Lp; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:41:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIAOW-0001tm-4d for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:41:12 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIAOW-0003il-2l for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:41:12 -0400
Received: from mercury.ccil.org ([192.190.237.100]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIANW-0005gf-1m for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:40:12 -0400
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GIANR-00004q-4a; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:40:05 -0400
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:40:05 -0400
To: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?
Message-ID: <20060829204005.GM22065@ccil.org>
References: <E1G8H4g-00035u-Ej@megatron.ietf.org> <001d01c6b78a$07b37890$040aa8c0@DGBP7M81> <44D36598.1020304@yahoo-inc.com> <20060829092257.GA22927@nic.fr> <20060829133301.GE8529@ccil.org> <44F474AC.7070906@yahoo-inc.com> <20060829192841.GE22065@ccil.org> <44F49947.1040301@yahoo-inc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44F49947.1040301@yahoo-inc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Addison Phillips scripsit: > If the list changes, that would be bad. Ideally, with a couple of > registrations and some deprecations, the list will entirely be formed of > tags that have no future, allowing a list to be, actually, a Good Thing > (not just "here they are", but also "don't use these any more, even > though they remain valid"). Here's my conclusions about each of the 34: Tag Type Action Preferred value === ==== ====== =============== art-lojban Broken Already deprecated jbo cel-gaulish Broken Deprecated in 3066ter en-boont Regular Redundant in 3066bis en-GB-oed Irregular Preserved en-scouse Regular Redundant in 3066bis i-ami Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter ami i-bnn Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter bnn i-default Irregular Preserved i-enochian Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter not known i-hak Irregular Already deprecated zh-hakka i-klingon Irregular Already deprecated tlh i-lux Irregular Already deprecated lb i-mingo Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter not known i-navajo Irregular Already deprecated nv i-pwn Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter pwn i-tao Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter tao i-tay Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter tal i-tsu Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter tsu no-bok Broken Already deprecated nb no-nyn Broken Already deprecated nn sgn-BE-fr Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter not known sgn-BE-nl Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter not known sgn-CH-de Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter sgn-sgg zh-cmn Regular Redundant in 3066ter zh-cmn-Hans Regular Redundant in 3066ter zh-cmn-Hant Regular Redundant in 3066ter zh-gan Regular Redundant in 3066ter zh-guoyu Irregular Already deprecated zh-cmn zh-hakka Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter zh-hak zh-min Broken Deprecated in 3066ter zh-min-nan Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter zh-nan zh-wuu Regular Redundant in 3066ter zh-xiang Irregular Deprecated in 3066ter zh-hsn zh-yue Regular Redundant in 3066ter A Regular tag is one that is both syntactically and semantically regular; a Broken tag is one that is syntactically regular but semantically irregular (it does not mean what it appears to mean); an Irregular tag is one that is syntactically irregular. So 8 tags will be changed to redundant in the RFC 3066ter regime; of the remaining 24, all will be deprecated except i-default and en-GB-oed. Possible discrepancies: a) Nothing in 639-3 seems to correspond directly to i-mingo or i-enochian. b) We may decide not to deprecate cel-gaulish or zh-min, which are sort of mini-macrolanguages. c) The split between sgn-BE-fr and sgn-BE-nl seems to be finer than 639-3 recognizes; we may need variant subtags to handle these. -- As you read this, I don't want you to feel John Cowan sorry for me, because, I believe everyone cowan@ccil.org will die someday. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --From a Nigerian-type scam spam _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Test suite for language tags? Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Martin Duerst
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Martin Duerst
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Region subtag changes John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka David Conrad
- [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka David Conrad
- RE: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Debbie Garside
- [Ltru] RS region subtag John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Available parsers? (Was: Test suite for la… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Available parsers? (Was: Test suite fo… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Martin Duerst
- [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags? Mark Davis