Re: [Ltru] Re: XML

Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Fri, 22 June 2007 06:45 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1ctc-0005sx-H5; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:45:28 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I1ctb-0005qk-Qu for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:45:27 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1ctX-0005WV-Ks for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:45:23 -0400
Received: from scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.251.195]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1ctU-0002UG-Nd for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:45:23 -0400
Received: from scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse2 [133.2.253.17]) by scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id l5M6jDnI028782 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:45:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (133.2.206.133) by scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp via smtp id 5665_20c342a4_208c_11dc_81df_0014221f2a2d; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:45:12 +0900
Received: from Tanzawa.it.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.210.1]:50877) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <SC4E08> for <ltru@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:43:15 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20070622154148.08b36570@localhost>
X-Sender: duerst@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:44:37 +0900
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "Reshat Sabiq (Re?at)" <tatar.iqtelif.i18n@gmail.com>
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: XML
In-Reply-To: <20070621203019.GA14054@sources.org>
References: <467ABCB8.9050103@gmail.com> <20070621203019.GA14054@sources.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

At 05:30 07/06/22, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

>Your schema seems quite clsoe to mine
>(http://www.langtag.net/registries/ltru.rnc) and I suggest that people
>interested in moving this schema from the current draft to a "real"
>schema, production-ready, gather in private since XML work is not well
>received on the LTRU list.

The statement in the last clause is only partially true.
When I made an attempt at a consensus call on this issue (many months ago),
my recollection was that a slight majority of the people responding
favored moving to XML, but that that majority wasn't strong enough
to make the change, in particular because the people who would have
had to do the actual work (read: editors) weren't very excited.

It is true that if we stay with the current state (no XML), then
we shouldn't use the list to discuss XML, because we want to
concentrate to get our documents out.

Regards,    Martin.



#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru