Re: [Ltru] Re: Small bibliography error in RFC 4930

Frank Ellermann scripsit:

> For 4646bis no implementation will be able to match nl-BE with
> what-was-it, vlm [recte "vls"], by only looking at the registry, unless
> we deprecate it manually in favour of nl-BE.

We can't do that; they are two different languages, though closely
related and intertwined in use  It would be like deprecating nds in
favor of de-northern.

And fy-DE could never have been more than a hack like zh-TW for zh-Hant:
is it North Frisian, or is it Saterfrisian aka East Frisian (not to be
confused with the variety of nds also called "East Frisian", still less
with the variety of Standard German (de) spoken in Ostfriesen)?

-- 
The Unicode Standard does not encode            John Cowan
idiosyncratic, personal, novel, or private      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
use characters, nor does it encode logos
or graphics.                                    cowan@ccil.org

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru