Re: [Ltru] Comorian and other issues

>Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 02:19:19 -0500
>To: Nicolas Krebs <nicolas1.krebs3@netcourrier.com>
>CC: ltru@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [Ltru] Comorian and other issues
>From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
>
>Nicolas Krebs scripsit:
>
>> After partial review of urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01 (
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-01 ), i found some
>> issue, a question and our old friend -western.
>
>Generic note:  These considerations are appropriate for the ISO 693-3
>Registration Authority, not for ietf-languages; we just clone what
>they provide.  My comments are not authoritative.

So ltru wg can not fix bug of ISO 639-3 ? 

>> 3 Comorian
>
>[snip]
>
>> If i understand correctly, swb is the encompass language, and the
>> other are dialect. Then:
>
>That's not the view of 639-3, which treats the four as separate and
>distinct languages.  Comorian (swb) is the largest, but it's not
>considered to encompass the others.

So swb correspond to specific (1) Comorian of people who said that there is 
no specific (1) Comorian and only one generic (1) Comorian ? 

1: i use deliberately two word of urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-0, 
correct me if i use it wrongly. 

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru